Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers putting down a grass field?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

fuging outrageous that this doofus caters to the demands of soccer players that don't even play for his team but won't listen to the demands of his own players. I'm way happier with how this offseason has gone than his first 5 years but damn Tepper this is the easiest fuging thing to do to make players and fans happy and he still won't budge. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

How much money you sending if it's so easy?

 

Get the board together and let's start a GoFundMe account. I will throw 1k in the pot to get this thing done.

I didn't say it'd be cheap, Tep has the money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

How much money you sending if it's so easy?

 

Get the board together and let's start a GoFundMe account. I will throw 1k in the pot to get this thing done.

Tepper is worth 18.5 billion I'm sure he can figure out how to keep real grass and still keep the lights on.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Donald LaFell said:

I love how they put grass down for the traveling soccer teams each time. It’s so deflating knowing that Tepper ultimately values flexibility for his entertainment biz vs winning or player safety. 
 

 

Like, they would only have to put grass down 10 times all year.  Its not like the NFL plays a poo ton of games or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

We should all take to Twitter and make a big deal about how awesome this is for the team so that Tepper doesn't have any choice but to keep it. 

Seriously only way is to make this a viral story

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering he has billions, Tepper can easily afford to have a grass field that would be safer for the players.
 
 "Grass is a significantly safer surface than turf," JC Tretter, NFLPA president said
 
The association reviewed past data and found that 10 of the previous 11 years showed that the injury rate on synthetic versus natural surfaces was considerably higher.
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, KatsAzz said:
Considering he has billions, Tepper can easily afford to have a grass field that would be safer for the players.
 
 "Grass is a significantly safer surface than turf," JC Tretter, NFLPA president said
 
The association reviewed past data and found that 10 of the previous 11 years showed that the injury rate on synthetic versus natural surfaces was considerably higher.

The only way it changes is if the NFLPA bans turf. Which I think is right around the corner.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

The only way it changes is if the NFLPA bans turf. Which I think is right around the corner.

 

Unfortunately, that is what this may come down to. The CBA has to hold the line. No sod, no trod. 

 

To bad the next CBA isn't until 2030. So, it may take some drastic measures. 

 

Force the NFL to abide by its "We're all for player safety" line. 

 

Fingers crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Unfortunately, that is what this may come down to. The CBA has to hold the line. No sod, no trod. 

 

To bad the next CBA isn't until 2030. So, it may take some drastic measures. 

 

Force the NFL to abide by its "We're all for player safety" line. 

 

Fingers crossed.

The only problem I see is that dome teams cannot have grass fields.  Do you force them to build new stadiums? Good luck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...