Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's Jets joint practice Day 1 (8.9.2023)


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

We seemed to represent ourselves much better today than we did against the Colts in the last combo practice we did. I guess Frank Reich won both. lol

I don't know man. If you reads the Jets Tweets, Aaron Rodgers pretty much moved the ball at will and there were quite a few holding and DPI's on the Panthers secondary. Quite a few busted coverages that led to huge gains as well. Obviously that's 7 v 7 for you when you're playing one of the GOAT's but, still, it wasn't as one sided as the tweets on this thread made it seem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

If we are going to post the good, we've got to post the bad. 

thanks for finding and posting the video. not even that bad, felt like a 50/50 ball. poor decision to throw it there but Chark (not TMJ...) could've done more to either catch it or at least prevent the pick

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

thanks for finding and posting the video. not even that bad, felt like a 50/50 ball. poor decision to throw it there but Chark (not TMJ...) could've done more to either catch it or at least prevent the pick

Yeah. It was a good read by the corner to break off of Ian Thomas (I think) and read the route. Looks like Chark didn't expect to have company because before he split the corner had his hips turned uphill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

You know what you’re right he washed he had a down year with rookies dropping passes left and right no true WR1. He might want to hang it up because last year he wasn’t destroying the league as he’s done for the last few years. I don’t even know why Vegas has them as one of the favorites to win it all with such a sorry qb playing.

It's okay to say the man had a down year without being a smart ass. Jesus Christ. Even the NFL players dropped him down below Kirk Cousins. I guess the players that play the game don't know poo, either? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

 

It literally means the same thing. Taking what the defense gives you is getting the ball where it needs to be, against what the defense is giving you. 

He's saying that Young needs to make the defense show it's hand pre-snap, which almost everyone tries to do.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...