Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Stewart - PSA to Panthers fans. It's preseason, don't panic.


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Again, it's preseason. The 4-0 2008 Lions and 2017 Browns went 0-16 the regular season. The 1-4 2009 Colts went 1-3 in the preseason and 14-2 in the regular season.


I'd be very curious to see the statistical correlation between preseason and regular/postseason success. 

Edited by PantherBoy95
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherBoy95 said:


I'd be very curious to see the statistical correlation between preseason and regular/postseason success. 

It's pretty hard to correlate when coaches go into games with different mindsets.

Perhaps some coaches want to evaluate certain schemes in different situations, some may just want to get through it healthy, others may want to boost morale.

With the preseason hinging on a very wide variable of coach intent, it's hard to really get a good statistical hypothesis on team success based on that.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience when the team looks bad in the preseason they look bad in the regular. I haven’t really seen enough individual efforts from guys to look excited. 
 

Right now they look pretty bad. I’d be surprised if they look much better in the regular season. 
 

I’m fine giving coaching 2-3 years to hit their stride but I expected a better preseason outing. Not really pessimistic about the team but I feel a little iffy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:


I'd be very curious to see the statistical correlation between preseason and regular/postseason success. 

There have only been two teams in NFL history who went undefeated in the preseason and then won the Super Bowl the following February. The 2003 New England Patriots were the first team to do it, and the 2013 Seattle Seahawks were the last team to do so.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many cocktails to be specific but the interview with Bryce during the game was interesting to me - the question was about playing the Falcons and how it will be different and he said the coaches have a process and they need to trust it.  But there was a hint of frustration. 

My take was that he can't wait to open it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I actually love the transfer portal and the NIL deals.  It makes it more exciting.  And I completely agree about the TV deals tied to the conferences is the real issue.  Even you bringing up Maryland is a great example.  They were a founding member of the ACC, and while not great at football in my lifetime, they were a huge part of the basketball fabric of the ACC.  I was pissed when they left for that reason alone…  and now in the ACC we have teams like Cal and Stanford which is clearly not the Atlantic Coast, all while teams like Clemson, FSU, and UNC are trying to get out.  I really, really hate that poo.
    • Teams like Cal and Stanford in the ACC is just dumb and it honestly shows how desperate they were. It's documented that west coast teams win less than expected when traveling to the east coast to play and now you're joining a conference where practically every away game puts you in that scenario.
    • Damn.  I stand corrected.  I wasn’t aware of Maryland’s national championship.  I was stating it more so just off brand and off the top of my head, tradition and prestige, namely the amount of notable pros they have turned out.  That was probably a dumb criteria to base it off of, but I just think that translates to competitiveness, and I never looked at Maryland as competitive in football in my lifetime.  I thought their move to the Big Ten was particularly stupid because when they left the ACC they weren’t even really competitive then.  So I feel like in terms of modern prestige, UNC is more relevant?  So I think they would have more appeal to potential suitors if they wanted to move conferences. And as far as the conferences go, I could be way wrong here, but my prediction is, the SECs and Big 10s of the world are going to shoot themselves in the foot if they’re not careful.  Yes, they are the big boys now, but if they’re continue to turn away viable candidates to join, like Clemson and FSU (and not homer talk, but UNC as well if they actually spent their money wisely), I predict they power is going to shift elsewhere, because the NIL money evens the playing field.  Look at Alabama now.  That’s why Saban left when he did…  he knew how to game the system as it was.  Were the players getting paid then?  Absolutely, but once it became legal to pay them at any school, who tf wants to go to Alabama?  If I’m not from there and I want to stay in-state, now an in-state school can pay me.  If I am from there and I have to choose between fuging Alabama and somewhere else that will pay me the same, why stay there?  Because just on its own merits, what is the appeal to Alabama?  But this example goes for anything.  Even a kid in Georgia.  Yeah, Georgia is more prestigious and a powerhouse, but what if Georgia Tech, or even Tennessee or Florida pays me more?  I just think the NIL has made it way different.  You don’t have to all funnel to Alabama or Georgia to be relevant anymore because anywhere can become a powerhouse school overnight, if done correctly.  So if the SEC and Big 10 keep acting all highsididdy on everybody, I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of those other teams that comprise the rest of the top 25-50 programs band together to form one other super conference that starts siphoning players away from them.
×
×
  • Create New...