Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting QB


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

I love how people just assume you can pick and choose which draft you will have the ability to choose a franchise QB.

The last 4 drafts have produced 15 QBs that will start week one. So getting a possible franchise QB happens in nearly every draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'll just take a moment here to say damn that touchdown pass to Theilen looked good 😁

I can't wait to see the offense they plan to run. This vanilla crap is tough to watch them try to get open so that Bryce has someone to throw to.  The running game should help with that.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scratched said:

The last 4 drafts have produced 15 QBs that will start week one. So getting a possible franchise QB happens in nearly every draft. 

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

He's both.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

I clearly stated getting a POSSIBLE franchise QB. Why do we need the #1 pick to get a franchise QB? Maybe you are the ignorant one? 

Edited by scratched
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, scratched said:

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

We got our franchise QB.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 11:28 AM, Jmac said:

Once they get the Oline fixed and if the WR Corp can stay on their feet....then yes, he is the right guy.

I agree.  The biggest problem I see is the offense line.  Even a GOAT cannot perform if he doesn’t have the time.

 

Edited by Green-Ghost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

You may have to throw Will Grier out here as he looked pretty good and pretty developed last night. Night and day to where he was. It takes a special person to make a starting NFL QB and then even more special to be good at it but unfortunately we have not had good coaching to develop a QB and looks like Grier could be one who slipped through the cracks because of piss poor unskilled coaching that could not develop anything or anyone pertaining to an NFL team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2023 at 1:19 PM, scratched said:

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

Or we could have traded down and drafted a bunch of crap. How many late round guys have we hit on? 

https://www.panthers.com/history/draft

Look at this since Rhule was here, we have hit on our 1st guy I guess and only really one 2nd rounder in Chinn, the rest are jags. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

You may have to throw Will Grier out here as he looked pretty good and pretty developed last night. Night and day to where he was. It takes a special person to make a starting NFL QB and then even more special to be good at it but unfortunately we have not had good coaching to develop a QB and looks like Grier could be one who slipped through the cracks because of piss poor unskilled coaching that could not develop anything or anyone pertaining to an NFL team. 

He was playing against nobodies, Grier is a journeyman, not a franchise QB. He played a full game against one of the worst teams in the league, it was also the guys that are going to be cut from said shitty team, running vanilla plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2023 at 1:00 PM, scratched said:

I clearly stated getting a POSSIBLE franchise QB. Why do we need the #1 pick to get a franchise QB? Maybe you are the ignorant one? 

You either have a top pick in the draft, you trade up, or you take a developmental guy with tons of question marks, thats why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...