Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big fan of Burns but...


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Sorry hubby(or whatever alt you’re annoying people with now). I laid out this entire scenario multiple time the day the story broke about the offer. Predicted this exact scenario. Was told then that it wouldn’t be a problem. 
 

  Some people actually have a clue and don’t just complain about everyone stating that a franchise that picks top 10 every year makes mistakes all the time. What’s your new alt going to be after you embarrass yourself again like last year defending Rhule? 

 

image.jpeg.4d84c3b11686866b69f8a510fff3a752.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

People act like replacing Burns is easy, just grab another one. We won't be able to add that WR most are pining for. And most Edge rushers need at least a year. Both are things this board cannot handle. It would be anarchy watching this team struggle to win. But hey, we have those 2 1st rounders.

There are other edge rushers available with the money we are going to pay Burns. It doesn’t have to be done strictly through the draft. Reddick provided what Burns did and signed for a lot less than Burns wants.
 

I don’t care about an elite WR. The SB champions just won with a bunch of WR3s. Pass rush isn’t everything. The kind of money Burns is wanting is for an elite DE, which he is not at this point. He’s a liability in the run game. For 25-30m a year, I want more than 12 sacks a year and a guy that cant play the run. Unless BY is the unicorn of unicorns of unicorns, we aren’t making a serious playoff run this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

I mean, I get him wanting money, but he made a point to say during training camp he’s showing up to practice. What changed? 

I think all sides try to be politically correct but when it comes down to brass tacks Burns is on the precise of generational wealth and needs to look out for himself. 
 

I can see why the team didn’t trade him to attract a new head coach, but I feel like willingly gave up leverage so I’m surprised they aren’t paying Burns. 
 

Even though the Patriots don’t draft well I really like their policy of trading the guys they can’t pay before their 1st contract. Keeps everyone happy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

Oooh somebody got upset. lol

Upset?  LOL. You’re the guy who complains about every other post and does the most cowardly thing a poster can do. Poo posts instead of giving reasons why you disagree. You’re a punchline who has run from Alts for being a simpleton. Your fellow fans on here laugh at you. Out of pity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

If he gets what's he's asking for, he isn't just getting elite DE money, he's getting elite defensive player money. Only players with bigger contracts would be Aaron Donald and soon Nick Bosa. 30m a season and it's why they aren't close on a deal. 

 

Ran through camp thinking he would get what he's asking for or close and is finding out that it isn't close and holding out and probably won't be on the field against Atlanta with out a new deal. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

People act like replacing Burns is easy, just grab another one. We won't be able to add that WR most are pining for. And most Edge rushers need at least a year. Both are things this board cannot handle. It would be anarchy watching this team struggle to win. But hey, we have those 2 1st rounders.

We frankly brought in a better pass rusher than Burns not long ago.  We let him go after a year.  He went on to sign a deal that is reflective of elite pass rushers.  Which is Burns.  Which isn’t Bosa money. 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

We frankly brought in a better pass rusher than Burns not long ago.  We let him go after a year.  He went on to sign a deal that is reflective of elite pass rushers.  Which is Burns.  Which isn’t Bosa money. 
 

 

 

let's quit living in the past. Let's stick to what is relevant for this year. We all know you are the most negative poster here. Not surprised you'd think like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

let's quit living in the past. Let's stick to what is relevant for this year. We all know you are the most negative poster here. Not surprised you'd think like this.

Acknowledging the current market/money for skills/players isn’t living in the past.  

what are elite pass rushers getting? That’s what Burns should be hovering around 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...