Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HEAVENS TO BETSY, LOOK AT THESE WIDE-OPEN RECEIVERS


Carl Spackler
 Share

Recommended Posts

I counted three (3) "missed" throws, one that could've gone for a TD, one that would've fallen short of the sticks on 3rd down, and one that would've gone for a 1st down.

Young started the game 12-18 (67%) for 91 yards, TD, INT, but finished it 8-20 (45%) for 55 yards and an INT. Some other things I noticed:

- quick screen to Shenault worked great. Was never run again
- Bryce's biggest mistake on his first pick was not taking the 8-yard completion to Mingo
- Needs to look Mingo's way more, the 3rd-and-8 pickup was a great play by QB and WR

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we got no speed to threaten vertically.  And if a D doesn’t respect the threat …..it makes coverage easier.  Because you end up taking half the guessing out of the equation for a DB.  They know everything is in front of them and play it that way. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

we got no speed to threaten vertically.  And if a D doesn’t respect the threat …..it makes coverage easier.  Because you end up taking half the guessing out of the equation for a DB.  They know everything is in front of them and play it that way. 

Our deep threat was out today, but Mingo should've had a 99 yard TD with a better throw and TMJ should've had a deep catch with a better route ran.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Those route concepts are pretty awful. A lot easier to cover when all the receivers are roughly at the same depth of the field.

Thank You!


Was saying this during the game thread plenty of times. Frank needs to find something else that gets players in different spots on the field. The routes just never looked good on the field imo.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

we got no speed to threaten vertically.  And if a D doesn’t respect the threat …..it makes coverage easier.  Because you end up taking half the guessing out of the equation for a DB.  They know everything is in front of them and play it that way. 

I have no Heisman Trophy and I have never worked for DoorDash in Tuscaloosa, but I would NOT throw deep to anyone on that fuging lineup today save for Jonathan Mingo. And even then it'd give me pause. Safeties were salivating at the deep ball with 7 in coverage.

We're gonna be angry at the OL next Monday when the sack total rises after NO blitzes more.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...