Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some positive and critical thoughts on yesterdays game


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You have to put some context on that too.

It's not like we were world users. Hell, the one truly good team we faced absolutely drubbed us.

Bill Parcells quotes aside, the Panthers weren't necessarily as good as our final record made some believe.

Right, but the most pro-ready QB and all star coaching staff shouldn’t start out the year like that IMHO. Rhule and Wilks had no trouble with Atlanta for 3 years.

No one was tempering anything until we looked a bit lost (starter wise) in preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Right, but the most pro-ready QB and all star coaching staff...

...have still only been together for a few months and were only playing their first game. Meanwhile, most of the teams they'll be facing our building on what they already had (Atlanta included).

Companies can put their products through hundreds of tests in a laboratory but it's not until you have a million random people trying to do a billion different things with it that you really know how good it is.

Remember how the lesson of the preseason was that our O-line was terrible?

There are things you just don't know until the live bullets start flying. Hell, we still don't know how good our team will or won't be.

You just have to be patient.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is what it is.  2 ints and a fumble cost us the game.

Bryce looked good at points and horrible at other points. As for the deep threat, when we did have the db beat deep, Young over threw it by a large margin.   Complete one of those and they will take it seriously, even without Byrd or Chark. We also saw miscommunication between QB and WR multiple times in a game, again.  Hopefully that doesn't take 8 games to clean up.

I'm a Bryce fan, but I'm not polishing this turd.  He laid an egg in this one.   Hopefully he'll bounce back. 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Yard per play definitely impact the game more than penalties. Turnovers are huge, but that’s not what I was saying. What I was saying is that due to the turnovers we looked like we controlled that game more with TOP and yardage. Looking at efficiency, they ran the ball and passes the ball better than us and had no turnovers. I might lean on the fact that that means they played better hence the 14 point win. Looking at the stats, I can’t say we were definitely the best team outside of turnovers.

They had .7 yds per play more than we did, that one long pass to Pitts gave them that advantage. I mean seriously, when was the last time you heard a coach at a press conference talk about cleaning up yards per play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

They had .7 yds per play more than we did, that one long pass to Pitts gave them that advantage. I mean seriously, when was the last time you heard a coach at a press conference talk about cleaning up yards per play?

SMH, let’s start cherry picking. It’s a stat and that long pass happened. It shows efficiency across the entire game. I was just trying to point out that it’s homerism that immediately says oh, we were better and we lost because of turnovers. We lost by 14 and the Falcons moved the ball on us, especially in the second half. If we had to punt instead of getting intercepted, probably doesn’t make a difference.

Also, the thing about the press conference is dumb. Coaches will absolutely say they have to clean up their run defense if they gave up 5 ypc like we did but they won’t mention the stat itself. Doesn’t mean the stat is meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

...have still only been together for a few months and were only playing their first game. Meanwhile, most of the teams they'll be facing our building on what they already had (Atlanta included).

Companies can put their products through hundreds of tests in a laboratory but it's not until you have a million random people trying to do a billion different things with it that you really know how good it is.

Remember how the lesson of the preseason was that our O-line was terrible?

There are things you just don't know until the live bullets start flying. Hell, we still don't know how good our team will or won't be.

You just have to be patient.

What you just outlined is why our preseason plan made no sense. Pretty sure you were one of the folks saying we were vanilla so don’t worry, we have to hide things from Atlanta and NO the first two weeks. That doesn’t jive with the it’s our first game and we’ve been barely playing together. If you know it’s going to take a while to get, why did we limit snaps and plays in preseason? Why wouldn’t you get all the live/bullets flying reps you can get?

I agree that it looked like we needed more time based on how we played. That’s why I think we did ourselves a disservice by being vanilla and limiting snaps. It certainly didn’t confuse or surprise Atlanta and I doubt it will surprise NO either. I know I posted my thoughts that who cares about hiding stuff, get all the live reps you can because I sure knew we weren’t competing this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

What you just outlined is why our preseason plan made no sense. Pretty sure you were one of the folks saying we were vanilla so don’t worry, we have to hide things from Atlanta and NO the first two weeks. That doesn’t jive with the it’s our first game and we’ve been barely playing together. If you know it’s going to take a while to get, why did we limit snaps and plays in preseason? Why wouldn’t you get all the live/bullets flying reps you can get?

I agree that it looked like we needed more time based on how we played. That’s why I think we did ourselves a disservice by being vanilla and limiting snaps. It certainly didn’t confuse or surprise Atlanta and I doubt it will surprise NO either. I know I posted my thoughts that who cares about hiding stuff, get all the live reps you can because I sure knew we weren’t competing this year.

I was one of the people talking about it being preseason, but not so much about hiding things.

You'll find me saying I didn't have much in the way of expectations going into this season, and I still don't.

Winning isn't what this season is about. It's about laying a foundation to win in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It seems some of you expect a lot from the current iteration of the Panthers, especially its rookie qb...

Handmaids Tale GIF by HULU

I thought we could beat the Falcons and honestly we were the better team.  We just beat ourselves.  I know what you are saying though this will be a year of growth and learning.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Right, but the most pro-ready QB and all star coaching staff shouldn’t start out the year like that IMHO. Rhule and Wilks had no trouble with Atlanta for 3 years.

No one was tempering anything until we looked a bit lost (starter wise) in preseason.

roughly half the board was tempering things.   

There have always been essentially two groups

Group A - we have an all star staff and should compete for a playoff spot crowd.  That starts most convos off with a game away last year and we just add on to that narrative. 

Group B - this is a rebuild, rookie QB, new coaches, new schemes, meh skill talent on O and you shouldn't expect much winning this year crowd.  It's about developing Bryce and how he looks down the stretch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with most of the summary. Only exception is that if the Falcons understood we couldn't go deep, then we should have known as well.  If BY is an elite processor, would he not have picked up on that - at least after he thre the first interception?

 

When I say the Jets DB get 3 picks, my first thought was I was glad our QB learned after 2 by the same guy. Difference was the Jets DB picked his in some variety of settings - Bryce threw almost identical INT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

roughly half the board was tempering things.   

There have always been essentially two groups

Group A - we have an all star staff and should compete for a playoff spot crowd.  That starts most convos off with a game away last year and we just add on to that narrative. 

Group B - this is a rebuild, rookie QB, new coaches, new schemes, meh skill talent on O and you shouldn't expect much winning this year crowd.  It's about developing Bryce and how he looks down the stretch. 

I think much of group A is who started the tempering expectations after the Jets and Giants preseason games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

roughly half the board was tempering things.   

There have always been essentially two groups

Group A - we have an all star staff and should compete for a playoff spot crowd.  That starts most convos off with a game away last year and we just add on to that narrative. 

Group B - this is a rebuild, rookie QB, new coaches, new schemes, meh skill talent on O and you shouldn't expect much winning this year crowd.  It's about developing Bryce and how he looks down the stretch. 

whats nuts is that 85% of the board predicted we would beat atlanta.  Then the same posters were saying calm down bryce is a rookie, now those same posters are predicting a win against the saints.  Its crazy.

 

We will take our lumps this year, maybe win 7 games and then position ourselves into the conversation in 2024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

whats nuts is that 85% of the board predicted we would beat atlanta.  Then the same posters were saying calm down bryce is a rookie, now those same posters are predicting a win against the saints.  Its crazy.

 

We will take our lumps this year, maybe win 7 games and then position ourselves into the conversation in 2024

I mean what’s wrong with that? Isnt that just the circle of life for a fan? I feel like I’ve seen 100s of parodies of people being like “this is our year” when they are a fan of an all time horrible team. It’s just the nature of beast.

 

As on record, I didn’t think we’d beat the falcons. However, I really hoped we would and woke up Sunday morning feeling like it could happen.  then bummed when we lost. Now im excited about playing the saints at home on national tv.
 

 

 

That’s the life of a fan.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...