Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Vibes


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, panthers55 said:

I think it is obvious to folks who frequent this site that certain posters beat the same old dead horses and have players or coaches they don't like and constantly complain about. So I don't need to point out what is clear to anyone paying attention.

 

Understood. Just wanted to make it clear I try to look at things objectively. I was a Teddy supporter while he was here but was also supportive of him leaving when the time came.
 

So my post in particular isn’t meant as a slight at Bryce. It’s to point out that the spread looked very Teddy-esque per that game and that it’s something to monitor once we get some speed back on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lame Duck said:

And people wonder why this franchise the way it is.  Fans settle for mediocrity and always look for good in bad and always “hope” for the future. -Result, a shitty franchise with no energy.

As to what? I see people using some rationale and logic. Our rookie QB looked like a rookie in his first start on the road. Do we need to start rioting outside the stadium? There is nothing wrong with waiting to see how/if he progresses as the season goes on. The most important thing in this league is getting a franchise QB. If this season can develop Young into one then it’s a win all day long.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thebdawg said:

Something I think that will really help Bryce is using his escapability and extending the play more often. He flashed his escapability big time in the Detroit preseason game. If our receivers can’t get open in 3 seconds, it could really help to escape the pocket and buy some more time when the pocket starts to collapse. It seems like he’s rushing his reads because he thinks he HAS to get the ball out before the pocket collapses.

This.

 

He had one fantastic run in particular to snag a 1st down and was hoping to see more of that as the game went on when guys weren’t getting open. I wonder if limiting him in this regard was by design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's talk about playcalling. How much was gameplanning, poor adjusting, poor execution, or something else.

You see the play run not the play called or what adjustments were or were not made. Were the protections good or not?  

How many plays like that first 4th and 1 were intentionally called right over the left to see what we are capable of rather than trying to score using a finesse play which stood a better chance of success.

The playcalling wasn't adequate and the execution was poor. But I am withholding judgement until I see some more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

As to what? I see people using some rationale and logic. Our rookie QB looked like a rookie in his first start on the road. Do we need to start rioting outside the stadium? There is nothing wrong with waiting to see how/if he progresses as the season goes on. The most important thing in this league is getting a franchise QB. If this season can develop Young into one then it’s a win all day long.

Folks have been using some rational and logic on this board for the past 7 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

So let's talk about playcalling. How much was gameplanning, poor adjusting, poor execution, or something else.

You see the play run not the play called or what adjustments were or were not made. Were the protections good or not?  

How many plays like that first 4th and 1 were intentionally called right over the left to see what we are capable of rather than trying to score using a finesse play which stood a better chance of success.

The playcalling wasn't adequate and the execution was poor. But I am withholding judgement until I see some more games.

It’s not just Young.  It’s the whole organization.  Top to bottom.  It’s poo.  Tom Brady would fail here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...