Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen placed on IR


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

He is tagged for eligible to return... so it may not be as bad as we think. Still its a gap at our LG spot. I wonder if Zavala goes LG and we give someone a shot at RG.

I mean, he kind of has to, no?

I know I spent yesterday arguing keeping him on the right even when Corbett came back, but that was assuming we had a healthy startle LG.

Don't think it's a good idea to throw Mays over there on Bryce's blindside, put him in at RG and slide Zavala over to the left and get him settled into his position for hopefully the next 10 years, a year earlier than I was hoping we'd need to do so.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I mean, he kind of has to, no?

I know I spent yesterday arguing keeping him on the right even when Corbett came back, but that was assuming we had a healthy startle LG.

Don't think it's a good idea to throw Mays over there on Bryce's blindside, put him in at RG and slide Zavala over to the left and get him settled into his position for hopefully the next 10 years, a year earlier than I was hoping we'd need to do so.

At this point you put the best player in at LG regardless of who it is. It's next man up. 

Fasten your seat belt folks. It's going to be a bumpy ride.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...