Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need a 1st rnd pick...opinions


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Need to trade Burns

And honestly, he won't get us a first back, but at this point I'd probably trade Chinn as well.

That one also has NOTHING to do with the player, but the coaching staff.

They seem hell bent on not using him.  What's the point in having a player with his versatility and talent to only have him on the field for 30% of the snaps?!?!?!?!

Totally opposite of Burns, I want Burns here but feel like his trade value is what's best for this team.  Chinn's playing ability is what is best for the team but the coaches seem to want to force him into being a slot NB only, which just makes no sense and is a waste.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers will be eliminated from the playoffs probabky after this week - and whenever the trade deadline is - maybe they can flip burns to a team going all in and get a first rounder for him. Doesn’t sound like the contract stuff is very close. 
 

man, what a dumpster fire this team has become. Terrible management, awful roster management, trading first round picks, terrible coaching hires. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Need to trade Burns

And honestly, he won't get us a first back, but at this point I'd probably trade Chinn as well.

That one also has NOTHING to do with the player, but the coaching staff.

They seem hell bent on not using him.  What's the point in having a player with his versatility and talent to only have him on the field for 30% of the snaps?!?!?!?!

Totally opposite of Burns, I want Burns here but feel like his trade value is what's best for this team.  Chinn's playing ability is what is best for the team but the coaches seem to want to force him into being a slot NB only, which just makes no sense and is a waste.

Burns won't get us a first back?  Didn't Denver trade Chubb and a 5th to Miami for a 1st, 4th and running back?  It was a contract year for Chubb too.  I would think Burns would fetch us something similar if not more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns won't get us a first back?  Didn't Denver trade Chubb and a 5th to Miami for a 1st, 4th and running back?  It was a contract year for Chubb too.  I would think Burns would fetch us something similar if not more.

lol, you read my post wrong

I've been the one telling people for the last 2 weeks that we'll easily be able to get 2 firsts for Burns, as worst case scenario we franchise tag him and someone will still sign him and get the 2 firsts that way, so someone will give that up at the deadline to get him to try and make a SB run this year.

The, "won't get a first for him" was in regards to trading Chinn, who I really have zero interest in trading, I'd love to sign him to an extension right now and use him correctly.  But the coaches seem to have no interest in doing that and I think some team out there might give up a 3rd rounder or something for him.

I'd hate the trade, but it's better than only playing him 1/3rd of our defensive snaps and then watching him walk in free agency.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jmac said:

What to they do to get a 1st rnd pick in 2024. What sort of package would you put together to make that happen?

Opinions please.....

 

 

 

If we take a 1 for Burns after turning down the Rams offer of two ones and a two, it's time to get the pitchforks out and head to Scott's house.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

lol, you read my post wrong

I've been the one telling people for the last 2 weeks that we'll easily be able to get 2 firsts for Burns, as worst case scenario we franchise tag him and someone will still sign him and get the 2 firsts that way, so someone will give that up at the deadline to get him to try and make a SB run this year.

The, "won't get a first for him" was in regards to trading Chinn, who I really have zero interest in trading, I'd love to sign him to an extension right now and use him correctly.  But the coaches seem to have no interest in doing that and I think some team out there might give up a 3rd rounder or something for him.

I'd hate the trade, but it's better than only playing him 1/3rd of our defensive snaps and then watching him walk in free agency.

Lol my bad.  It's been a long day.  Yeah Chinn won't get us a 1st.  I was getting frustrated with Chinn making plays on Monday then getting pulled the next play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Lol my bad.  It's been a long day.  Yeah Chinn won't get us a 1st.  I was getting frustrated with Chinn making plays on Monday then getting pulled the next play.  

Right?!?!

He's not a safety, he's not a NB, he's a LB who can be shifted around all over the field as needed on a per play call basis.

His rookie year was about the only thing Rhule's staff ever got correct and he was looking like a future all-pro type of player.  Ever since then, coaches have been trying to shove him into a neat little box and force him to play a position instead of just being a heat seeking missile out there attracted to the football. 

We will likely have too much cap space available this offseason to get comp picks in return if guys like Chinn walk as we're going to end up bringing in a couple decently paid FA's.  So if that's the case and we're not going to try to actually use him, might as well try to get something for him now instead of having him on the sideline for 70% of the plays this year and watch him walk away for free in the offseason.

At least Burns is out there on the field trying to help us right now, makes it at least easier to understand wanting to keep him around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...