Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers actively shopping for a WR

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted (edited)

Good lord. 

Well draft picks are utterly useless to us while Fitterer’s in charge so go ahead and trade them. However this FO has proved enough times they have no idea how to address the WR position. Also thought trading our best WR was a good idea 

I’m all for trading for a WR but I’d like the guy doing the trading to have a clue and that’s not Scott

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheBigKat Grand Master

TheBigKat

Posted
Posted

The ONLY WR that is game changing enough and worth further draft capital to make a dent is Davante Adams, but why in the world would he want to play with a dumpster fire team again if leaving LV. You're getting Davante solely for the purpose to help transition Young to the NFL and not have him completely broken before his career even starts.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

The ONLY WR that is game changing enough and worth further draft capital to make a dent is Davante Adams, but why in the world would he want to play with a dumpster fire team again if leaving LV. You're getting Davante solely for the purpose to help transition Young to the NFL and not have him completely broken before his career even starts.

 

Only issue with Adams is he’s going to be 31 in 2.5 months

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Tee Higgins and a 1st for Brian Burns would be the ONLY option I would entertain.

After all the bum ass trades Fitterer has done, DO NOT let him make any more fuggin trades. He has wasted so many of our assets, he clearly does not recognize talent.

No way Cincy includes a 1 with Higgins for Burns.

That one would be closer to a straight up player swap I think

Quite frankly, I think I’d be fine with that. 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...