Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ladies and Gentlemen... The Maestro is in the building!


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

He had like one incompletion in the second half? Moved the ball well. Offensive line couldn’t hold up. Bryce played well today. 

How did Teddy Bridgewater not teach everyone that completions don’t matter, but the type of completion is what matters. 
 

Bryce is basically handing the ball off dinking the ball around. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

He had like one incompletion in the second half? Moved the ball well. Offensive line couldn’t hold up. Bryce played well today. 

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

The loss doesn't bother me. The lack of flashes do. Where were the flashes? He made one nice play where he scrambled and found a receiver for about 10. That was the only plus play if the day that I can recall that I wouldn't expect any NFL caliber backup QB to make.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't trade everything for Teddy Bridgewater. We crucified Teddy Bridgewater for this. Bryce basically threw nothing but screens and checkdowns 90% of his drop backs. His one deep ball was badly underthrown despite his receiver being grabbed and slowed down.  The yards per completion are a big problem. We're just not offering anything with Bryce to vertically threaten the defense.

Teddy Bridgewater was a veteran. Bryce is a 22 year old rookie. He took the plays that were there and made throws down field when they were there. The team has to be better around him. A number of drives were killed due to either the offensive line not blocking or senseless penalties. That’s not on 9. 
 

If you came away from this game discouraged by Bryce Young that’s a you problem. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

I'm not seeing a single person saying Bryce was the reason we lost.  Reich is far and away getting the most fruit hurled at him post-play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

I think it's becoming more and more crystallized that the "smooth brain contingent" are those that keep making excuses for this sorry ass organization.

They traded the farm for a guy they don't trust to throw the ball beyond the line of scrimmage.  No one is asking him to drop back and sling it 20 yards every play - the problem is that he can't throw it 20 yards AT ALL.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...