Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Playbook intelligent discussion


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

"for a team that was only one player away."  Anyone who believed that is freaking moron.

Like I said, dude literally said that we were sold "a bill of goods."

Some people did believe that. I wouldn't refer to them as "morons" though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting because Burns being misused and Chinn not being used enough falls strictly on Evero.  YGM growing also does in a positive way.  He also has pieced together a banged up secondary to his credit.  We probably need to trade Burns sooner vs later or his value could drop if we aren't using him right.  Houston and YGM can bee our edges with a Haynes (coming back from injury soon) and Barno filling in.

The Reich stuff is a complete mess.  If he can't manage the clock he doesn't need to be worrying about what vanilla plays we are running.  Let Brown do his job so he can be a better HC.  He is simply not a HC than can handle play calling plus everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Like I said, dude literally said that we were sold "a bill of goods."

Some people did believe that. I wouldn't refer to them as "morons" though.

Okay, how about criminally ill-informed? Is that better?  You shouldn't be doing sports analysis, especially for the local team if you cant take a basic lay of landscape.  I can get Suzie housewife that may go to one Panthers game a year maybe being that gullible, but any self-respecting fan (real fan) knows that was and is a complete BS statement about a player away. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BeenPounding said:

I thought the past two games Chinn played very well.  Because of injuries he is a true nickel CB.  If someone else rises up, hopefully he can play closer to the LOS.

I think it's more Chinn is good as a situational football player, but not every down because he lacks a true position. 

He's a defensive gadget player if you will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It's interesting because Burns being misused and Chinn not being used enough falls strictly on Evero.  YGM growing also does in a positive way.  He also has pieced together a banged up secondary to his credit.  We probably need to trade Burns sooner vs later or his value could drop if we aren't using him right.  Houston and YGM can bee our edges with a Haynes (coming back from injury soon) and Barno filling in.

The Reich stuff is a complete mess.  If he can't manage the clock he doesn't need to be worrying about what vanilla plays we are running.  Let Brown do his job so he can be a better HC.  He is simply not a HC than can handle play calling plus everything else.

Him mismanaging the clock is a perfect example of why most HC's do not call the plays.  He doesn't have the bird's eye view from the box, he is thinking about other aspects of the game as the HC, and his sole focus is not on making adjustments with the rest of the staff since he is not with them upstairs.  Andy Reid, Shanahan, and Sean McVay are the outliers when a HC calling plays works.  If his approach is truly collaborative maybe he can let Brown call the plays and override when he feels necessary.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Okay, how about criminally ill-informed? Is that better?  You shouldn't be doing sports analysis, especially for the local team if you cant take a basic lay of landscape.  I can get Suzie housewife that may go to one Panthers game a year maybe being that gullible, but any self-respecting fan (real fan) knows that was and is a complete BS statement about a player away. 

Are you trying to imply the two guys in the video ''believed'' the front office hype...?

The guy reporting from his home (whose name escapes me atm) has been skeptical of the offensive skill players since free agency, and Chris Lea has been a little more optimistic and I'd say steady in his thoughts since Frank came on board...

So depending on the point you're trying to make you seem ill-informed in regard to these guys' background on the Panther's situation. 

They're a decent listed, you may want to go back and review. 

I think most of us felt the OL was at least in a good spot, not as bad as it's been, BUT we're playing rookies / back ups on the interior with a 5'10 QB. 

We could stand to move the pocket some more, and get some misdirection on offense, there were a few read type run handoffs where the DE / OLB / Edge setter is COMPLETELY ignoring Bryce keeping the ball. 

This should not be a ''staple'' in our offense, but we could run a read option a few times just to cut down the backside pursuit and even the box count a bit. 

We look like a 90s offense but with Pistol.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

Are you trying to imply the two guys in the video ''believed'' the front office hype...?

The guy reporting from his home (whose name escapes me atm) has been skeptical of the offensive skill players since free agency, and Chris Lea has been a little more optimistic and I'd say steady in his thoughts since Frank came on board...

So depending on the point you're trying to make you seem ill-informed in regard to these guys' background on the Panther's situation. 

They're a decent listed, you may want to go back and review. 

I think most of us felt the OL was at least in a good spot, not as bad as it's been, BUT we're playing rookies / back ups on the interior with a 5'10 QB. 

We could stand to move the pocket some more, and get some misdirection on offense, there were a few read type run handoffs where the DE / OLB / Edge setter is COMPLETELY ignoring Bryce keeping the ball. 

This should not be a ''staple'' in our offense, but we could run a read option a few times just to cut down the backside pursuit and even the box count a bit. 

We look like a 90s offense but with Pistol.

 

Are you seriously suggesting we run the read option with Bryce?  You did see the fumble yesterday with the arm tap, correct?   When he scrambles on a protection breakdown, he doesn't look half bad, but to suggest he should run right into the teeth of the defense is mind blowing.

I agree, there could be some pre-snap motion.  It's not been absent, but nearly so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Okay, how about criminally ill-informed? Is that better?  You shouldn't be doing sports analysis, especially for the local team if you cant take a basic lay of landscape.  I can get Suzie housewife that may go to one Panthers game a year maybe being that gullible, but any self-respecting fan (real fan) knows that was and is a complete BS statement about a player away. 

That's basically what was said. My goodness! Anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...