Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The impressive throw you wanted from Bryce

TheCasillas

By TheCasillas,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted

I'm just trying to understand why so many are stuck on drooling over players from other teams at this point. 

It doesn't matter if Stroud is a HOFer in 3 years and Bryce is out of the NFL next year. Bryce is the Panthers' QB. Stround is the Texans QB. That ain't gonna change. It would make more sense to compare him to 2nd round QBs in next year's draft or 1st rounders in 2025. 

No one can argue against Stroud having the most success thus far - 4 games in, or that AR looks like Cam lite. No one. But unless you're just gonna switch to a Texans or Colts fan, then it makes no sense to dog your QB out and overanalyze him because he isn't another rookie QB taken 1-2 picks after him in the draft. Stroud missed throws. AR misses reads. Every QB that has ever played does. We don't know who Bryce will ultimately be, after 3 friggin games. 

I didn't want the Panthers to move up to #1 to get any QB in this draft. I thought we needed more playmakers and actual WRs before bringing in a rookie QB, for the reasons we're seeing Bryce struggling now. But Bryce is a Panther now. So he's my guy until he isn't. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersGOATFan336 Grand Master

PanthersGOATFan336

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Navy_football said:

I'm just trying to understand why so many are stuck on drooling over players from other teams at this point. 

It doesn't matter if Stroud is a HOFer in 3 years and Bryce is out of the NFL next year. Bryce is the Panthers' QB. Stround is the Texans QB. That ain't gonna change. It would make more sense to compare him to 2nd round QBs in next year's draft or 1st rounders in 2025. 

No one can argue against Stroud having the most success thus far - 4 games in, or that AR looks like Cam lite. No one. But unless you're just gonna switch to a Texans or Colts fan, then it makes no sense to dog your QB out and overanalyze him because he isn't another rookie QB taken 1-2 picks after him in the draft. Stroud missed throws. AR misses reads. Every QB that has ever played does. We don't know who Bryce will ultimately be, after 3 friggin games. 

I didn't want the Panthers to move up to #1 to get any QB in this draft. I thought we needed more playmakers and actual WRs before bringing in a rookie QB, for the reasons we're seeing Bryce struggling now. But Bryce is a Panther now. So he's my guy until he isn't. 

It's gives a standard to what a first round rookie qb should look like

Edited by PanthersGOATFan336
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was a nice throw. I'm not anti-Bryce. I want to see more nice throws. I'd be happy as hell to be wrong about my doubts.

I think we all would.  I wanted CJ when I heard about the trade up, but I was bamboozled by all the hype around Bryce's ability to read the field etc.  Other than Tepper selling the team to a good owner, there is nothing I would want more for this team than Bryce to be legit.  But that doesn't change the reality of what we've seen so far.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

A donkey could run the sh!t we’re running on offense right now which seems to be the extent of Reich’s system so why in the hell did we take some “super processor” and not the guy with the size, mobility and best natural arm 

IMG_7479.jpeg.c588869c4ae8b1267f604aea9a56e7ab.jpeg

Given what we’ve seen this actually makes a lot of sense. We’d still be f’d but at least we’d have our 1st rounder and DJ Moore

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Based on what?

Person gets a lot of sh!t around here but he’s a pretty reliable source. He isn’t always right but from what we’ve seen from Bryce in 3 games and Dalton in 1, I think it makes sense Reich would have wanted Carr. It really does look like Frank doesn’t trust Bryce. The decision to try and move up to 1 happened well before Frank got here. I mean I knew they were going to try to get up to 1 before Frank got here. I think Frank is a terrible HC but this whole Bryce thing falls more on Tepper/Fitterer than it does Frank

And to be clear it ultimately doesn’t matter who’s to blame for this we’re stuck in this situation now. We already know we have a David Tepper problem on our hands. I said the other day, he wanted fields and let Matt/Scott take Jaycee, he wasnt about to let the QB of his choice get overruled again

Edited by *FreeFua*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...