Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 5 NFL games


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

We are so far away from attempting a flea flicker. That's an automatic scoop and score for the opposing d

We have never even sniffed that level of trickeration in the franchise's history. It's almost like the team is wired to be boring and conservative in its play. A bit like the Titans actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cowboys need to move on from Dak. He's the problem. That team has the talent, the QB just isn't very good.

 

Also why the hell does NBC keep showing these players parents and telling their life story. So cringe. We want to watch football not discuss a players mom and dad.smh

A lot of cowboys fans have been jaded at best with Dak for a while now. There's a reason why they picked up trey Lance out of the blue 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cowboys need to move on from Dak. He's the problem. That team has the talent, the QB just isn't very good.

 

Also why the hell does NBC keep showing these players parents and telling their life story. So cringe. We want to watch football not discuss a players mom and dad.smh

I've always thought that he's basically an average starter. Not bad but far from great. He's an asset on a rookie contract but becomes a liability when he's eating up a huge chunk of your cap.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cowboys need to move on from Dak. He's the problem. That team has the talent, the QB just isn't very good.

 

Also why the hell does NBC keep showing these players parents and telling their life story. So cringe. We want to watch football not discuss a players mom and dad.smh

Dude. You grin from ear to ear when they show celebs on the sidelines at Colorado games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've always thought that he's basically an average starter. Not bad but far from great. He's an asset on a rookie contract but becomes a liability when he's eating up a huge chunk of your cap.

I think Dak kinda bamboozled them by overshooting his draft position by being a decent game manager while zeke was in his prime first few seasons and they had an incredible offensive line. Dak always gets exposed when he goes against upper echelon defenses because he was never a top 10 level QB. Cowboys fans are frustrated because they've already seen his ceiling repeatedly that's why they just can't get passed the 49ers 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...