Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trapasso: Young's first few starts are concerning


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

And how does that make Bryces turnovers less concerning? 

Becuase he's a rookie and played 3 games?

If he's still fumbling like that next year, then I'm concerned.

I'm not bothered by the turnovers at all, just the throwing downfield

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

In short, it's just not translating. Being a great college player doesn't automatically translate to being a great NFL player. There's a long history of great college players not translating to the NFL. It's usually one of three things. 1. The player lacks the physical tools to replicate the same success at the NFL level. 2. The player lacks the mental tools to replicate the same success at the NFL level. 3. Off-field stuff.

The primary factor limiting Bryce's success so far couldn't possibly be more obvious and it's not because he's a dummy on or off the field.

you listed all these reasons and not one of them blame the coaching lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Does BY pass the eye test three games in to his nfl career?

the answer is no. He doesn’t even physically look like an NFL player. 

it looks like we're running a fake field goal with the kicker throwing on every down.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, scpanther22 said:

you listed all these reasons and not one of them blame the coaching lol

Watch the game Andy Dalton played. See the difference.

I don't think our coaching is great, don't get me wrong. But I also realized these guys have a lot of experience in the NFL and it's probably not as bad as we hope it is to cause Bryce to look this bad either. Then there's that small inconvenience of watching Dalton throw for 350+ yards and 2 TDs with this same staff, same OL, and same weapons.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Watch the game Andy Dalton played. See the difference.

I don't think our coaching is great, don't get me wrong. But I also realized these guys have a lot of experience in the NFL and it's probably not as bad as we hope it is to cause Bryce to look this bad either. Then there's that small inconvenience of watching Dalton throw for 350+ yards and 2 TDs with this same staff, same OL, and same weapons.

The game I saw with Dalton wasn't as positive as those stats suggest. I saw play that was marginally better that suggest coaching is making everyone look bad

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

I'm a realist who tries to be objective before making up my mind. I have made up my mind about Frank Reich: nice guy, but uninspiring  head coach whose not situationally adept, and whose product is not conducive to winning a championship. I've made up my mind about Scott Fitterer: out-of-the-box thinker who gets waxed in deals because he's unable to appraise the value of his own players and hold other GM's feet to the fire, as well as being a somewhat sketchy talent evaluator.

Now, I haven't made up my mind on Bryce Young, and I think it's generally unfair to be making definitely negative statements about a rookie only three games in, QB or not. That being said, I am as concerned as any Panthers or Young fan about what I've seen. Chris Trapasso of CBS is concerned, but he has extra juice to back it up. 

 

"His efforts have been wholly uninspiring and ultra-conservative. They've lacked the creative brilliance we watched for two seasons at Alabama, and his weaknesses have been highlighted in each contest.

"From a statistical perspective, Young's current 4.9 yards-per-attempt average ranks 249th out of 261 quarterbacks in modern NFL history (since 1961) to attempt at least 75 passes in their first three professional starts (rookie year or not)."

"...even those who weren't completely enamored with Young -- like myself -- had to admit: the guy made tremendous off-script, outside-of-structure plays at Alabama look routine. 

"...Young's athleticism has been stretched to the limit. His pressure-to-sack rate of 22% is the 10th-highest in football (meaning he's been sacked 22% of the time he's been pressured). His overall sack rate is 9.6%, not brutally high for most rookie quarterbacks but decently alarming for a No. 1 overall pick who was tabbed as an improvisation specialist."

 

Trapasso's concerns are legit, but he did like many people do and did not really provide any context regarding Young's specific situation. Comparing him to C.J. Stroud's situation just doesn't do it for me because he didn't mention play calling and coaching. To Trapasso's credit, he did say that Stroud hasn't "done extreme heavy lifting operating Houstons offense," and said that Texans receivers (who some try to downplay here) are getting open "much more frequently" than what's going on here, but he basically intimated that Young is getting shook by a less than stellar line, while Stroud seems unaffected.

Trapasso also is suggesting that Young's best asset pre-draft was his improvisation. We've seen a flash or two of that, but I'd say that Young's processing was his best trait. All we can do is hope that with more experience and better coaching that things turn around. Otherwise, this is going to turn from an imperfect storm to the perfect storm to the sum of all fears. 

Let's hope that some of our fears are put to rest today.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/as-c-j-stroud-stars-for-texans-heres-why-bryce-youngs-first-few-starts-have-been-concerning/

 

Lol dawg you were giving me poo for saying Reich could be on the hot seat after this year or even gone now you’ve made up your mind too!

Edited by t96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...