Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is JC Horn marketable?


Kick
 Share

Recommended Posts

He will be in the league a long time with his current tape, I think. He just is starting to look like he’ll never be the player he couldve been but could still improve a secondary and be really good. 
 

Almost reminds of TDs early injury misfortune. Still ended up being a hell of a player but maybe not what he could have been. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CBDellinger said:

No it wouldn’t be prudent to trade our only corner who also happens to still be on his rookie deal with a 5th year option.    Keep him and sign someone legit opposite him.  

Opposite him and behind him*

Since his back-up will actually be the starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CLG said:

He will be in the league a long time with his current tape, I think. He just is starting to look like he’ll never be the player he couldve been but could still improve a secondary and be really good. 
 

Almost reminds of TDs early injury misfortune. Still ended up being a hell of a player but maybe not what he could have been. 

Good perspective. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

he is marketable in the sense he is a high tier player when healthy and has another year on his rookie deal.  So if you are a good team.  He would make a lot of sense if you had a hole in your secondary. 

we can't extend his contract.  not to a deal that matches his talent.   we aren't going to do anything of note next year.  Right thing for us given his history would be to let him walk.  I would trade him if you could find a deal for him.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

No it wouldn’t be prudent to trade our only corner who also happens to still be on his rookie deal with a 5th year option.    Keep him and sign someone legit opposite him.  

we are rebuilding though.  We aren't contending this year or next.  So what purpose does he really serve if he isn't part of the long term plan.  And Horn shouldn't be part of the long term plan and be here after his rookie deal is over.  His injury history says we shouldn't extend him to money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

we are rebuilding though.  We aren't contending this year or next.  So what purpose does he really serve if he isn't part of the long term plan.  And Horn shouldn't be part of the long term plan and be here after his rookie deal is over.  His injury history says we shouldn't extend him to money. 

hes cheap and if he gets healthy and balls out you have the option for another year at an affordable rate.  he doesnt hold much trade value at this point, why create another hole on the roster and eat his dead money?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

hes cheap and if he gets healthy and balls out you have the option for another year at an affordable rate.  he doesnt hold much trade value at this point, why create another hole on the roster and eat his dead money?  

 

 

I get he is cheap now.  But that's also what would make him potentially attractive to a good team. 

you want them to extend and pay a DB that has been that comically injured? If you don't.....then he isn't part of our plans.  Even if he balls out this team isn't going to do anything next year.   So he just ends up walking.  Why not get stuff for assets that aren't part of the long term plan.  Because our future success would have to be in the long term not short term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...