Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL needs better research staff (YouTube / Sunday Ticket-related)


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

From a Sports Illustrated interview:
 

Quote

 

SI: Do you see a future for à la carte game-buying, like being able to buy single out-of-market games, or a broadcast season ticket for an individual team?

BR: We’ve never liked that model. We haven’t heard a ton of that in our fan research that they want that. We think the value of the product is pretty good. Is there an opportunity for less than all games, maybe. We haven’t seriously talked about à la carte games. That’s nowhere really in our future.


 


source: https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/10/24/streaming-media-rolapp-future-games-youtube-sunday-ticket 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the league that doesn't want it with how their revenue split works. With the TV contracts they can rationalize the even split. But if the fans can actually buy the games they want and nothing more it's going to really expose the reality that a lot of teams just flat out don't matter and don't drive viewership. 

If you have cable or satellite or currently have Sunday Tickets or whatever they call it these days and a bad game is on you might still tune it, at least to have it in in the background since there's no additional cost incurred. But if say the Panthers and Bears are playing on Thursday night football and you can tune in for say $4.99, how many people are honestly gonna do that? 

Wouldn't take long for the owners of the teams that are driving all the actual viewership to start demanding their fair share of the revenue and stop floating the David Teppers of the league who consistently field a product no one seems worthy of shelling out the money to watch.

Me personally? I absolutely wish they would. Owning an NFL team would not longer be a guaranteed golden ticket. There would be very strong financial incentive to field a winner and not just live off of the league split being carried by the teams folks actually want to see.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Whats the most you would pay for an single game on TV?  Assume its the same broadcast with the same commercials.

 

 

Id love an a la carte option but honestly I dont know that Id pay more than ~20 bucks per game which is pretty much what Sunday Ticket breaks down to.

I wouldn't pay a damn dime to watch the team that Tepper is fielding.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's the league that doesn't want it with how their revenue split works. With the TV contracts they can rationalize the even split. But if the fans can actually buy the games they want and nothing more it's going to really expose the reality that a lot of teams just flat out don't matter and don't drive viewership. 

If you have cable or satellite or currently have Sunday Tickets or whatever they call it these days and a bad game is on you might still tune it, at least to have it in in the background since there's no additional cost incurred. But if say the Panthers and Bears are playing on Thursday night football and you can tune in for say $4.99, how many people are honestly gonna do that? 

Wouldn't take long for the owners of the teams that are driving all the actual viewership to start demanding their fair share of the revenue and stop floating the David Teppers of the league who consistently field a product no one seems worthy of shelling out the money to watch.

Me personally? I absolutely wish they would. Owning an NFL team would not longer be a guaranteed golden ticket. There would be very strong financial incentive to field a winner and not just live off of the league split being carried by the teams folks actually want to see.


Not going to happen. Pro sports is cyclical. Team suck for a while and are good for a while. Being a KC or NE (past 20 years) is mostly luck anyway. No one is going to tie their financial future to lucky or unlucky draft picks. Besides, even the good teams everyone watches need the bad teams to fill out a schedule.

Also, the players union would never agree to that since a non-even split would impact the salary cap. They don’t want some teams having $150 mill to spend while others have $250. Spreading the love evenly is in the best interests of all players.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Not going to happen. Pro sports is cyclical. Team suck for a while and are good for a while. Being a KC or NE (past 20 years) is mostly luck anyway. No one is going to tie their financial future to lucky or unlucky draft picks. Besides, even the good teams everyone watches need the bad teams to fill out a schedule.

Also, the players union would never agree to that since a non-even split would impact the salary cap. They don’t want some teams having $150 mill to spend while others have $250. Spreading the love evenly is in the best interests of all players.


 

Oh, I agree. It's not going to happen. I do find it curious how much stringent capitalists can openly embrace a system that is outright socialist though. It's an interesting phenomenon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's cable's old model and no real surprise. It would be like them actually admiting that Thursday games are trash and are only done for easy income.

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I agree. It's not going to happen. I do find it curious how much stringent capitalists can openly embrace a system that is outright socialist though. It's an interesting phenomenon.

Not really. Capitalism is just using anything and everything to make profit. How they justify that is just noise to confuse those that would get in the way of that. Once you get past the idealism of John Smith that is the brutal reality. China had 607 billionaires in 2022 and the US had 735 so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

That’s about all I want. What they really mean is that they can charge more for packages. It’s the same reason you have to buy 5 streaming platforms to watch all the shows you like.

Apple+ has doubled their price in the last year.

The "go with streaming" vs "cut the cable package" price differential is narrowing, with the differentiator being stream-only content + convenience 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

I would be very very interested in that.  I would subscribe to just the Panthers games here in Texas, or hell, pay 10 bucks a game, with the ability to pick the choice games I wanted each week.  Although I DO like the ability to just watch any game I want as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Apple+ has doubled their price in the last year.

The "go with streaming" vs "cut the cable package" price differential is narrowing, with the differentiator being stream-only content + convenience 

I think a lot of cable cutters pay more now.  They frankly now forget how many subscriptions they have.   Prices are all going up.  Everyone is cherry picking things to force consumers to want and need more services.   Easy to justify adding something that is just 10 bucks or whatever. 

Streaming is sort of like AirBB.  It was awesome at first.  Now it just bologna.   Makes more sense to go back to cable and regular hotels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

For me it’s not even paying to watch single games. It’s about paying to watch single teams. NBA does this for like $14 a month. I don’t live in the Carolina’s anymore and I’d pay $30 a month just to be able to have access to Panthers games only. 

I'm outside the carolinas too and only give a poo about the Panthers, Sunday Ticket is a huge ripoff and I feel like such a huge sucker for paying for it especially a year like this where we suck. Through comcast I get the nhl & nba combo package which I only use for Hornets and Canes for like $150 a year, which is very reasonable. I think I could add baseball to that for cheap but don't care about it. NFL is the only league fuging over their customers like this but unless we start speaking with our wallets collectively nothing will change and I'm guilty of paying for sunday ticket this year and probably will be a dumbass next year and do it too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...