Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who ended up on today's injury report...right before the trade deadline.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burns is seriously overrated and comparing him to Bosa is crazy. Burns has never taken over a game. The best he's liked is when we had Reddick on the team. He can't beat double teams on a regular, consistently dissappears in games abs gets out run by QB's. Burns is a good player but he doesn't have Bosa value on this team because he gives up or quits during games. He needs a a Reddick to be successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GhostWhispah said:

Cause he DESERVED an extension! Bosa won't play until he got his extension and they made him the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. Fitter would NOT even offer him a reasonable but fair extension which is Burns deserves.

https://sidelionreport.com/posts/3-players-the-detroit-lions-could-trade-for-to-bolster-lagging-pass-rush/3

https://clutchpoints.com/lions-trade-2023-nfl-deadline

Brian Burns did not earn Bosa bucks. And he hasn't yet so far this year.

I sure wish he had, but that's just what it is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

Burns is seriously overrated and comparing him to Bosa is crazy. Burns has never taken over a game. The best he's liked is when we had Reddick on the team. He can't beat double teams on a regular, consistently dissappears in games abs gets out run by QB's. Burns is a good player but he doesn't have Bosa value on this team because he gives up or quits during games. He needs a a Reddick to be successful. 

I love how people call themselves Panthers fans, but talk down on specific players. It's crazy how this board continues to talk down on one of our better players.

 

 

Do better huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, onmyown said:

Paying Burns close to Bosa money on top of all these other dumbass moves will absolutely destroy and cripple this franchise for years to come.

We are already on the brink of that if not there already. Burns is not only NOT worth that but even IF he all of a sudden takes over games, this team is too trash for it to matter. Just like CMC.

Should've traded him when we had the chance, but if they can recoup a first+ right now, that is the smartest move with a house cleaning looming.

Burns is not the problem. The problem is Tepper. He hired bad coaches and lets Fitt waste our draft picks on bad players.

 

We will continue to suck even after we trade Burns. We just traded 3 of our best players in just 2 years. 

 

 

This franchise is a joke!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I love how people call themselves Panthers fans, but talk down on specific players. It's crazy how this board continues to talk down on one of our better players.

 

 

Do better huddle.

I agree to a point---some may take it a little too far---but Burns deserves some criticism here because he's taken his contractual expectations too far. He was offered a fair contract commensurate with his worth to the team and his production relative to other EDGEs in the league. In my opinion, I think he's just being greedy, but that's his choice. His head got a little inflated due to the Rams offer.

Burns is good, maybe even "really good" at times, but he's never been great. If we pay him like he's great, then the only way that we'll be able to "fix" it is to draft (or luck up on) a player who actually is great so that we can exploit his rookie contract at the same time as being hamstrung by Burns' contract, because this hypothetical player would ironically be the very thing that helps Burns to raise his game to a point where he appears to be great. But, of course, finding that player would be difficult, and we might not ever do it. In the meantime, we'd just be stuck with an overpaid rusher who is almost what you want sometimes. I just don't want to be in that situation.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

Now being reported that he’s probable to play, which means the injury was legitimate.

 

you wouldn’t give a guy a phantom injury if you’re trying to trade him. 

He has been playing hurt for the past couple games. He typically has been playing through it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Burns is not the problem. The problem is Tepper. He hired bad coaches and lets Fitt waste our draft picks on bad players.

 

We will continue to suck even after we trade Burns. We just traded 3 of our best players in just 2 years. 

 

 

This franchise is a joke!

Only reason Burns is one of our “best” players is because we suck. On a better team with a better line he would be just another cog in the in the wheel. Replaceable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Growl said:

Now being reported that he’s probable to play, which means the injury was legitimate.

 

you wouldn’t give a guy a phantom injury if you’re trying to trade him. 

Also means he's not getting traded before Tuesday.

 

Now we have to keep hearing these Burns haters for the rest of the season. Just when you think it couldn't get any worse.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Only reason Burns is one of our “best” players is because we suck. On a better team with a better line he would be just another cog in the in the wheel. Replaceable. 

Stop it.

 

On a better team with better players he would be even better than he is now. 

 

Wake up dude we are the worst team in football. Any player on this roster would look better on another team. Tepper has turned this franchise into a laughing stock.

 

I kind of hope we trade Burns just so he can get to a better situation. Those picks we get will just be wasted anyway Fitt is clueless when it comes to the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Bye week really got a lot of key guys injured

such a joke

You can see that a lot of our players are mentally checked out already. Lots of niggly injuries during the games, where they have to come out for quarters at a time. Now they're making it official. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...