Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce defenders, please give me a reason why you're still hopeful


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ncfan said:

This is the answer.

Bryce was awful yesterday. Rookies have awful game.

But for the most part of the season, he’s been standing in front of a firing squad.

 

 

It amazes me with this fan base.  We have the same people who lost their sh!t for years because Cams OL.  Who went to town crying to the mountains how even elite QBs can’t even overcome bad OL.

Now we have a rookie QB 7 games in with an even worse OL, and we’re ready to write him right off.

Check out Cams rookie supporting cast

 

IMG_0282.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Dumb thread. No one would look good behind this line and in this offense. David tepper has destroyed this franchise 

The line is running a scheme they are not built for because we have a small QB who cant operate under center. 

With a bigger QB we could run the power run scheme with heavy PA that we ran last season and actually have guys get open. 

Nobody respects our run or pass game because they both suck, we dont have the OL or the weapons for the scheme that Bryce has to run. 

I hope when this round of coaches get fired that they reveal how much Tepper had to do with selecting Young. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

 

More excuses, our line looks like dogshit because they cant block for this scheme. IF we were able to line up under center and pound the rock with timely PA passes a lot of their woes would disappear.'

I dont get running this same bullshit every week and hoping it will magically get better.  Why are we bending our entire team to suit BY . Make him line up under center and play some big boy football and stop with the cutesy bullshit. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really a Bryce defender, but I will say...if we can play to his strengths, meaning be more like Alabama, he can lead the team down the field methodically. Eat the clock. Get into the red zone, where we know he can score. That can be a good formula for winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 96Bravo said:

I'm not really a Bryce defender, but I will say...if we can play to his strengths, meaning be more like Alabama, he can lead the team down the field methodically. Eat the clock. Get into the red zone, where we know he can score. That can be a good formula for winning. 

Our team is not built for BY, he would look good on a team like the dolphins as they are currently constructed. We need OTs suited for the scheme, kick icky into guard. We need a top tier WR and a handful of guys that can at least get open from time to time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...