Fowler rips Tepper

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, OldhamA said:

No problem with that piece (as someone with a Journalism degree).

Personally I wouldn't be calling out a vindictive billionaire, but more power to Fowler. 

my brother said the same thing, those dudes know people who know people who know people.  Not saying its violence but someone worth 22 billion can make life miserable through various channels for a damn columnist or anyone for that matter

[BrisbanePanther]

31 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

my brother said the same thing, those dudes know people who know people who know people.  Not saying its violence but someone worth 22 billion can make life miserable through various channels for a damn columnist or anyone for that matter

It won't take all that.

He'll just right a check tomorrow and buy the Observer. Then sack Fowler. Then buy the next media outlet that hires Fowler. Then sack him again. On and on and on...all while spending the equivalent of couch cushion change.

[carpanfan96]

3 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Reich did not build his offense for Bryce like he should have. He just took his old and outdated offensive schemes and told Bryce to deal with it. Reich was such a terrible hire.

Reich built the offense for the qb he wanted which wasn't Bryce. 

[Tbe]

36 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Reich built the offense for the qb he wanted which wasn't Bryce. 

He purposely built an offense with terrible OL play and slow WRs that can’t get open?

[WhoKnows]

5 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I believe he said that frank told him at the combine who he liked or something to that effect.  

What? If Reich told a Colts beat writer who he liked at QB, knowing the Colts needed a QB and we had a pick 5 picks after, that is about the stupidest thing Reich can do. Hopefully, he was just blowing smoke. Again, we didn’t have the number 1 pick until a month after the combine.

[4Corners]

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

No problem with that piece (as someone with a Journalism degree).

Personally I wouldn't be calling out a vindictive billionaire, but more power to Fowler. 

Real Journalism is a dying profession anyway. You really aren’t supposed to be a part of the story, but I guess in this day and age who cares. 
 

 

[stratocatter]

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

Injecting yourself into the story doesn't make for bad journalism.

Technically, it used to. 

[4Corners]

9 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

Technically, it used to. 

Yeah but I mean I guess he is right. In this day and age, in the era of clicks and tweets and like and publicity, it really doesn’t matter if some clown reporter makes it about himself. Me me me me is what’s it’s about now. 

[stratocatter]

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Yeah but I mean I guess he is right. In this day and age, in the era of clicks and tweets and like and publicity, it really doesn’t matter if some clown reporter makes it about himself. Me me me me is what’s it’s about now. 

I disagree with you on a lot but not that.

[Pejorative Miscreant]

6 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Yeah but I mean I guess he is right. In this day and age, in the era of clicks and tweets and like and publicity, it really doesn’t matter if some clown reporter makes it about himself. Me me me me is what’s it’s about now. 

 

Totally right about this.

 

[top dawg]

44 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

Technically, it used to. 

Not so much for editorials.

[kungfoodude]

Once Dan Snyder was out of the NFL, there was little question who the worst owner in the NFL was.

 

Now we have removed all doubt.

[ickmule]