Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shouldn't They Try Some new WRs? 🤔


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I want us to either trade for Aiyuk or sign Hollywood Brown this offseason. If we can sign Hollywood we should also draft a weapon early. Hollywood, AT, Tez (or another rookie), plus 2nd year Mingo is s solid group for Young to work with. Mingo can become our slot when AT is done. 

Mingo I don’t think fits a slot role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

I'm getting sick and tired of seeing Mingo Chark and TMJ underperform. Why not give ISM and some other some chances? They're 1-8 what would they have to lose? Do they just not care?

Is there just no point given Bryce /o line can't do well enough to get the ball to them? 

This team would have Steve Smith still returning punts so Isaac Byrd could get more reps. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I want us to either trade for Aiyuk or sign Hollywood Brown this offseason. If we can sign Hollywood we should also draft a weapon early. Hollywood, AT, Tez (or another rookie), plus 2nd year Mingo is s solid group for Young to work with. Mingo can become our slot when AT is done. 

I doubt Aiyuk is going to be on the trade block. He’s one of the best pure receivers in the league and has emerged this year in SF as their 1. Would love it though, one of my fave players in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I doubt Aiyuk is going to be on the trade block. He’s one of the best pure receivers in the league and has emerged this year in SF as their 1. Would love it though, one of my fave players in the league.

I agree but some people think they might ship him for picks due to salary cap issues. IMO they would be better off trading Deebo now that they have CMC, but who knows. 

https://www.nbcsportsbayarea.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/espn-predicts-brandon-aiyuk-trade/1668555/?amp=1

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, lightsout said:

Strachan had a big 45 yard gain and one other target and I don't think he saw the field after that much.

He had 13 offensive snaps for the game, which I suppose is not bad for a guy fresh off the practice squad.  He is a track star, so he definitely has speed, I hope they can find some use for him.  

Fwiw, the pass to him definitely showed that Bryce can throw a nice deep ball when he has time and an open receiver.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I agree but some people think they might ship him for picks due to salary cap issues. IMO they would be better off trading Deebo now that they have CMC, but who knows. 

https://www.nbcsportsbayarea.com/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/espn-predicts-brandon-aiyuk-trade/1668555/?amp=1

Interesting, agree they'd be better off dishing Deebo.  Aiyuk would be a big one.  He's one of the best route runners and separators in the game.  There would be no more excuses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMJ as well as our offensive line looked prime to break out and be the least of our worries. Now with this revolutionary offense created specifically for Bryce, everybody looks like they have never played football. I mean seriously, McAdoo had us looking like we had a decent offense that needed a few pieces. Now it is complete trash. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthTryon said:

TMJ as well as our offensive line looked prime to break out and be the least of our worries. Now with this revolutionary offense created specifically for Bryce, everybody looks like they have never played football. I mean seriously, McAdoo had us looking like we had a decent offense that needed a few pieces. Now it is complete trash. 

TMJ was never close to a breakout. He’s sucked the entire time he’s been here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...