Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you watch CJ Stroud and wonder ‘what if’?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Or QBs who are 2nd in the NFL in passing yardage. It's not like I'm begging for a Mac Jones here.

But keep hoping Bryce hits puberty I guess.

Being delusional doesn't make you a better fan. It just makes you delusional.

You still on this Sam Howell poo bro? He has legit receivers. I’m done talking to y’all about Bryce until we assemble a NFL caliber team around him. 

  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

Muh QBR!!! That's what you're going to cling to? Some arbitrary formula?

How's Bryce's QBR looking?

I don't hide my UNC fandom. It's just hilarious you're trying to act like some rational fan when clearly just being a hater.

Like you’re literally rooting for mid. I bet you wanted Sean May to be a Bobcat too, huh?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You still on this Sam Howell poo bro? He has legit receivers. I’m done talking to y’all about Bryce until we assemble a NFL caliber team around him. 

Yes, because when we draft a #1 overall pick it is widely expected they need a full team of amazing players to even look competent

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think about it. 

It just speaks to Teppers personality and that he somehow knows better or has to go against the grain to prove something.

In order for Bryce to be worth the trade he has to be THE statical outlier for his size . He has to be a borderline HOF.

All he had to do was let Frank take Stroud. Or resign Wilks and let him take Stroud and keep our run first /deep shot philosophy. Something that the roster was built to do.

But he has to be a meddle and an idiot.

None of that is Bryce’s fault btw.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...