Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith on the firings


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, hepcat said:

If it was Brown’s offense and playbook, he would have called the plays from the beginning and he would have been the one getting fired for the anemic offense instead of Frank. It was the same trash offense Frank Reich ran in Indianapolis. 

Yes, it was the same trash offense. I don't know how anyone would argue against that point. 

Brown may have had some say, but I doubt that that B.S. was his, mostly his, or his alone. 

According to Google, the Rams run a "West Coast variant that's heavily based on the wide zone run." I don't think Reich actually knows what that is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Yes, it was the same trash offense. I don't know how anyone would argue against that point. 

Brown may have had some say, but I doubt that that B.S. was his, mostly his, or his alone. 

According to Google, the Rams run a "West Coast variant that's heavily based on the wide zone run." I don't think Reich actually knows what that is. 

Brown himself said he wrote the playbook "from the ground up" before the season ever started. Why would he lie?

Now, was it influenced? Yes.  Brown listed both Reich and McVay as influences on what he wrote, though Reich's likely would have been greater.

As far as specifics, my guess would be the lack of pre-snap motion would have been Reich's preference. Likewise, the heavy use of shotgun and certain personnel groupings. On the flipside, as I recall some analysts didn't see many of the mesh concepts and triangle read patterns that were common for Reich before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know the more I think about it the more I actually buy the conspiracy that Reich really wanted Stroud or Richardson all along, and maybe to prove his point stubbornly refused to change his offense to suit Bryce's needs despite evidence that he needed to. 

Here's my evidence:

1- Tepper admitted that for a long time the Panthers actually planned to trade to 2 to get Stroud, aka during the hiring process of Reich this was likely 'the plan'

2-Despite trading up to one, Stroud was the overwhelming favorite to go to the Panthers for *months* it took up until a week or two before draft week once the leaks started the Bryce became the favorite. Now Vegas does NOT intentionally lose money. Plus there are a ton of reporters who say the talk around the league was that Reich loved Stroud

3- Now here's where it gets tricky. I think they traded up to one and never really thought about it until it finally happened. Well when it did Fitterer, Tepper and likely a lot of other people in the building had Bryce as QB 1 which was not a preposterous take at all. But I think Reich never *really* got on board. He said all the right things because he realized the ship was already in motion but I think he still really wanted Stroud

4- Cut to this year, Bryce is obviously struggling in our offense while Stroud looks incredible. This is obviously not all Bryce's fault and there are multiple systemic issues that would make it impossible for damn near anyone to overcome but I think it secrely made Reich a little annoyed. So instead of changing himself for Bryce he said you know what fug you guys. I wanted Stroud, that's what I signed on for and then you made me draft a guy I didn't want, no I won't change. 

Cut to starting1-10 with the worst offense I've ever seen...

Here's a final thought: Everyone talks about how impatient Tepper is but it could be argued he kept Hurney, Rivera and Rhule all one year too long. Reich he definitely didn't wait too long, why? Because Reich basically wanted to get fired. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CRA said:

Well they all seem to be in agreement and quoting defensive coordinators that Frank Reich has been painfully predictable and the entire league knows what we are doing.   And unless you have a roster of all pros you will simply lose in the NFL if that is what you are.   

 

Is this what they said when the hire was made?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Brown himself said he wrote the playbook "from the ground up" before the season ever started. Why would he lie?

Now, was it influenced? Yes.  Brown listed both Reich and McVay as influences on what he wrote, though Reich's likely would have been greater.

As far as specifics, my guess would be the lack of pre-snap motion would have been Reich's preference. Likewise, the heavy use of shotgun and certain personnel groupings. On the flipside, as I recall some analysts didn't see many of the mesh concepts and triangle read patterns that were common for Reich before.

And that's what I was so excited to see when someone mentioned it after the hiring. Actually scheming guys open instead of, run the route and beat your defender. Steve Smith is the last receiver this team has had that could do that consistently. And that wasn't route running as much as, being faster than the defender and/or outjumping them for the ball at the point of attack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Brown himself said he wrote the playbook "from the ground up" before the season ever started. Why would he lie?

Now, was it influenced? Yes.  Brown listed both Reich and McVay as influences on what he wrote, though Reich's likely would have been greater.

As far as specifics, my guess would be the lack of pre-snap motion would have been Reich's preference. Likewise, the heavy use of shotgun and certain personnel groupings. On the flipside, as I recall some analysts didn't see many of the mesh concepts and triangle read patterns that were common for Reich before.

Even if I concede that he wrote the playbook, honestly plays are similar, if not the same in many instances, across the league. That being said, having plays is half the battle (or less), it's actually Knowing when to call them that counts. Of course you should also be trying to run the plays which best fit the strengths of your personnel, and players have to successfully execute the plays as well. 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SOJA said:

You know the more I think about it the more I actually buy the conspiracy that Reich really wanted Stroud or Richardson all along, and maybe to prove his point stubbornly refused to change his offense to suit Bryce's needs despite evidence that he needed to. 

Here's my evidence:

1- Tepper admitted that for a long time the Panthers actually planned to trade to 2 to get Stroud, aka during the hiring process of Reich this was likely 'the plan'

2-Despite trading up to one, Stroud was the overwhelming favorite to go to the Panthers for *months* it took up until a week or two before draft week once the leaks started the Bryce became the favorite. Now Vegas does NOT intentionally lose money. Plus there are a ton of reporters who say the talk around the league was that Reich loved Stroud

3- Now here's where it gets tricky. I think they traded up to one and never really thought about it until it finally happened. Well when it did Fitterer, Tepper and likely a lot of other people in the building had Bryce as QB 1 which was not a preposterous take at all. But I think Reich never *really* got on board. He said all the right things because he realized the ship was already in motion but I think he still really wanted Stroud

4- Cut to this year, Bryce is obviously struggling in our offense while Stroud looks incredible. This is obviously not all Bryce's fault and there are multiple systemic issues that would make it impossible for damn near anyone to overcome but I think it secrely made Reich a little annoyed. So instead of changing himself for Bryce he said you know what fug you guys. I wanted Stroud, that's what I signed on for and then you made me draft a guy I didn't want, no I won't change. 

Cut to starting1-10 with the worst offense I've ever seen...

Here's a final thought: Everyone talks about how impatient Tepper is but it could be argued he kept Hurney, Rivera and Rhule all one year too long. Reich he definitely didn't wait too long, why? Because Reich basically wanted to get fired. 

Reich, game after game let guys fly around Icky to destroy Young. He saw what was going on and did NOTHING to plan around it. It was a power play against Tepper. Tepper knew that unless he fired Frank, then Frank would continue to let Young get destroyed. Do you think Frank would ever let that happen to Stroud? 
 

Just wait and see how much protection Bryce gets from his blind side the rest of the season.  

This take will be validated. You heard it here first. 

It’s criminal what Frank did. 
 

Young wasn’t my guy, but right now he’s our guy and that’s just wrong. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Even if I concede that he wrote the playbook, honestly plays are similar, if not the same in many instances, across the league. That being said, having plays is half the battle (or less), it's actually Knowing when to call them that counts. Of course you should also be trying to run the plays which best fit the strengths of your personnel, and players have to successfully execute the plays as well. 

Neither Reich nor Brown did that consistently.

I've grown to believe that Brown may not have been ready to be an OC.

That doesn't excuse Reich, mind you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Reich, game after game let guys fly around Icky to destroy Young. He saw what was going on and did NOTHING to plan around it. It was a power play against Tepper. Tepper knew that unless he fired Frank, then Frank would continue to let Young get destroyed. Do you think Frank would ever let that happen to Stroud? 
 

Just wait and see how much protection Bryce gets from his blind side the rest of the season.  

This take will be validated. You heard it here first. 

It’s criminal what Frank did. 
 

Young wasn’t my guy, but right now he’s our guy and that’s just wrong. 

 

couldn't agree more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...