Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper

Pazhoosier89

By Pazhoosier89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gapanthersfan Veteran

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted

Any of y’all married peeps ever have your wife refuse to get off your back about an issue for over a week? Yes, of course you have. It always starts with a ‘hey babe’ or a ‘hey hun.’

Hey hun, I really think Brian is going to flourish in the 3-4. We really have to keep him. When are you meeting with the coaches and Fit again? I really think you should bring it up. 

Yup. It’s a wrap.

Wives heavily influence decisions on issues that they choose to take part of. How many ‘no way’ replies to her suggestions do you think he gets until his life is total hell? 

It’s not like bad team decisions are losing them any money in this. Owning pro sports teams are a hobby for them more than anything else. When they can put a winning team together I may change my mind.  
 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ickmule Grand Master

ickmule

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, TN05 said:

Yeah, this is the problem right here. It's the peak of narcissism to try and give your wife - someone who, apparently, has no experience in any sort of executive environment, let alone a football one - a major role in the organization.

What she got down under must be damn good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RayRedd Collaborator

RayRedd

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, ickmule said:
8 hours ago, TN05 said:

Yeah, this is the problem right here. It's the peak of narcissism to try and give your wife - someone who, apparently, has no experience in any sort of executive environment, let alone a football one - a major role in the organization.

What she got down under must be damn good. 

How would you describe it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted (edited)

I didn't want to wade into this thread because I knew the sexism would be over the top.  Yep, I was right.

For those of you that don't know how to be critical without being a pig: Nicole Tepper has no notable experience in football therefore having her involved as a football decision maker is not a great look for the team.  Her working in the PR and community facing operations is great since that seems to be the role she's played before.

I have no problem critiquing her qualifications and experience - the results open it all for examination.  Asking what she adds to any football evaluation is really fair.  No problems there!

Sexist: Nicole Tepper is using her sexuality and femineity to influence the Panthers.  Many of y'all have been much more crass about that point, and it's just gross.  Some of y'all act like you have never felt the touch of a woman, that all women are objects designed for pleasing YOU.  It's super gross.  Talking about her having sexual relations with players, the quality of her sex acts, her general appearance...  You sound like 7th graders who found the national geographic with boobs in it that feel behind the book shelf in 1989.

Edited by d-dave
context
  • Pie 5
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leaky_Faucet Community Regular

Leaky_Faucet

Posted
Posted
On 12/4/2023 at 4:35 PM, Mr. Scot said:

There is a part of me that wonders whether Frank letting everyone know about the weekly meetings played a part in his firing.

It certainly has drawn a lot of negative press.

Oh I wouldn’t doubt it. Matt revealed the same thing a few weeks before he was fired I think, or maybe the year before- I can’t remember. 
 

I kinda felt like Reich dropped a lot of passive aggressive jabs in his pressers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Tone deaf.  My God this is insanity 

To be fair, she might not know anything about the story that's come out today.

I'd be willing to bet a years salary Dave does though, and he's probably fuming about it.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...