Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers Should NOT want Ben Johnson


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

The "Leader of men" trope is kind of cringy these days. Reeks of "Back in my day, we did it right" energy.

You don't need a leader of men, you just need a leader.

You can lead in multiple ways. You can be a Rah Rah hype guy like Cam Newton/Dan Campbell, you can be a stoic even keeled guy who doesn't get flustered like Julius Peppers/Bill Belichick, or you can be a damn savant who just gets how things work, so people listen to what you say because they know you know your poo like Sean McVay/Luke Kuechly.

A great leader needs to be strong in their convictions, but be flexible to change when necessary; able to manage people from all walks of life, and understand what needs to happen to get the job done. Being an X's and O's savant is a huge bonus, but those are the Belichicks, Shannahans, and McVays of the NFL and few and far between.

Rhule didn't know how to coach grown-ups and tried to lord over them. Same issues Josh McDaniels seems to have wherever he is the HC. They act like gods to be worshiped, not coaches that respect their players as Men.

Reich was a pushover, so it lead to disarray throughout both the Colts and Panthers - Colts had players gambling in the facility and missing meetings with no punishment, with the Panthers he was so stubborn with his offense that had become completely outdated in the modern NFL.

Rivera was a good leader, but too stubborn and set in his ways which was his downfall here and seems to be the same issue up in Washington.

It's hard to hire a guy who hits all the requirements of a great leader, that's why there are so few truly great coaches in the NFL.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Martin said:

Who do some people think Ben J is not a leader? Is that the word out there? Have I missed something? We know he’s a spectacular play caller, so that one checks the box for sure.

I honestly have no idea about how he handles people. All we hear about is how he's a football savant and the next Kyle Shannahan. No idea if he can manage people like Shannahan does.

All I hear from Lions fans is that he's a giant asshole who kicks puppies and poisoned the local water supply, but that's all in jest because they don't want to lose the best coordinator they've had in decades.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, csx said:

Commentary I've heard questions why he's such a popular candidate. They have a nice offense but it's not some unseen juggernaut that should propel a 2 year coordinator to the limelight 

I mean I think it’s as simple as the fact that he’s had the Detroit Lions (of all teams) as a top 5 offense in his two years as playcaller. They’re 3 this year in total team offense and the only teams above them are SF and MIA whose playcallers are also the head coaches. Thats impressive. They are more talented offensively this season but he’s still cooking with rookies and last season with even lesser personnel. 
 

As for his leadership, I personally think the best way to try and tell how well a OC is as a leader is just seeing how well prepared his unit is on a week to week basis, especially when the OC is the actual playcaller. The Lions offense seems pretty prepared week to week imo. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson is the hot name but let’s not forget he has a decent roster 

Who built it ?

someone, not named Scott Fitterer, has got to get the roster right for this franchise, based on the systems run 

I’m way, way past believing, keep this system on defense and gut the offense 

they need a GM who can build a complimentary roster not made up of the ‘hero ball’  (a La Cam Newton)  of the past and ‘let’s throw something on the wall’ to see if it sticks of the Tepper era.

that new  GM also now has someone else’s drafted QB to deal with.

if I’m Tepper, I’m looking at franchises that have built sustainable rosters for that GM, then worry about HC

however, we all know Fitterer is his ‘yes’ man and Tepper does like his shiny toys

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

Johnson is the hot name but let’s not forget he has a decent roster 

Who built it ?

someone, not named Scott Fitterer, has got to get the roster right for this franchise, based on the systems run 

I’m way, way past believing, keep this system on defense and gut the offense 

they need a GM who can build a complimentary roster not made up of the ‘hero ball’  (a La Cam Newton)  of the past and ‘let’s throw something on the wall’ to see if it sticks of the Tepper era.

that new  GM also now has someone else’s drafted QB to deal with.

if I’m Tepper, I’m looking at franchises that have built sustainable rosters for that GM, then worry about HC

however, we all know Fitterer is his ‘yes’ man and Tepper does like his shiny toys

So, you're saying......

 

The lions are hiring Ray Agnew to become their assistant GM. | Instagram

  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2023 at 10:46 AM, raleigh-panther said:

Johnson is the hot name but let’s not forget he has a decent roster 

Who built it ?

someone, not named Scott Fitterer, has got to get the roster right for this franchise, based on the systems run 

I’m way, way past believing, keep this system on defense and gut the offense 

they need a GM who can build a complimentary roster not made up of the ‘hero ball’  (a La Cam Newton)  of the past and ‘let’s throw something on the wall’ to see if it sticks of the Tepper era.

that new  GM also now has someone else’s drafted QB to deal with.

if I’m Tepper, I’m looking at franchises that have built sustainable rosters for that GM, then worry about HC

however, we all know Fitterer is his ‘yes’ man and Tepper does like his shiny toys

I think its the opposite, I think Tep is Fitt's yes man essentially.  He's pretty much chief advisor to Tepper... just like Hurney was before they "parted ways". Tepper has little to no working football knowledge so his reference is the GM.  Hurney was kept to teach him the ropes and then he hired another advisor that was "aligned" with the HC to continue the work.  Also.... for better or for WAY worse I think that's the reason that Nicole is rearing her head this past offseason. Leveraging her words against Scott's... all just messy business. Time for a total reset in the FO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...