Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coach/GM Updates


Recommended Posts

Quote

 

I hope we get somebody good but for all the reasons mentioned somewhere in the thread we probably are not.

Fans keep asking why do these guys take the interview if they are not interested. If you are in the corporate world you know exactly why, it is a negotiating tool, it drives up your price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Right bc why wouldn’t you want to at least try and interview one of the best coaches in football? 

Because you want to remain the Alpha…the real Alpha would rip someone up…the fake Alpha would throw a drink. 

Edited by KBRed
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schuyler Callahan per Hondo (Raiders beat writer) thinks we're making a strong push for Champ Kelly as GM. Callahan thinks Brandt Tillis may be the guy. If you want to hear, here's the link (start at about 28:40):

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/podcast-panthers-gm-search-picking-up-steam

 

In other news, Graziano predicts Brian Callahan to be the guy at HC.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/01/17/espn-insider-prediction-panthers-hc-search-brian-callahan-joe-burrow-bryce-young/

The article mentioned that it's difficult to predict the HC due to the (Tepper) situation.

I'd be remiss not to mention that Morgan seems to be high on the list for GM. There are thoughts that Tepper wants to keep him in some capacity.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Right bc why wouldn’t you want to at least try and interview one of the best coaches in football? 

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

You’re absolutely right, that’s why I’m going with we should interview him. Until I read or hear that he said no or we don’t want any part of him, I will go with my statement of we should at least try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

It's been reported that harbaugh has asked twice about the Panthers. He clearly wants the job

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

It's been reported that harbaugh has asked twice about the Panthers. He clearly wants the job

i could see it possible that we have reached out and he’s not answering. if it’s true that he has reached out to us, and we’re not answering, then i’m fully on board the Tepper is an idiot wagon.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Schuyler Callahan per Hondo (Raiders beat writer) thinks we're making a strong push for Champ Kelly as GM. Callahan thinks Brandt Tillis may be the guy. If you want to hear, here's the link (start at about 28:40):

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/podcast-panthers-gm-search-picking-up-steam

 

In other news, Graziano predicts Brian Callahan to be the guy at HC.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/01/17/espn-insider-prediction-panthers-hc-search-brian-callahan-joe-burrow-bryce-young/

The article mentioned that it's difficult to predict the HC due to the (Tepper) situation.

I'd be remiss not to mention that Morgan seems to be high on the list for GM. There are thoughts that Tepper wants to keep him in some capacity.

From the writer...

If that's true, damn 😳

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

i could see it possible that we have reached out and he’s not answering. if it’s true that he has reached out to us, and we’re not answering, then i’m fully on board the Tepper is an idiot wagon.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/jim-harbaugh-nfl-rumors-michigan-coach-talked-with-panthers-but-owner-david-tepper-didnt-initiate-call/

That was last year and they reported that he still is interested in being here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...