Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Morgan to report to Tepper


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Who are they supposed to report to, Roger Goodell?  Jfc wait til the season starts at least before judging the new guys

It was supposed to be a hire to be the buffer between Tepper and the coaches.....WTF happened to that ?

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

It was supposed to be a hire to be the buffer between Tepper and the coaches.....WTF happened to that ?

Morgan may still be that on the unofficial basis as President of Football.

 

We don't know and won't know unless somebody in the team shares their org chart.  I'm going to choose to be hopeful because being miserable and pessimistic all offseason is depressing .

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really fussed about the structure. It's fairly common across all sports. The Kroenke's own my football (soccer) team and the manager and sporting director report directly to Josh Kroenke but he just writes the cheques and lets them get on with it. That's what Tepper needs to do. What's gone before doesn't fill you with hope but there's always a chance he changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess all we can do is hope for the best. Person isn't on Teppers birthday list, so maybe he is writing shitt now to get under his skin. I will give the new guys the benefit of the doubt obviously. 

You are all correct. Let's  see how this plays out in a few months when the fall rolls back around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all we have to go on as far as interpretation during the tepper area is him micromanaging. this isn't an uncommon practice within the league, but it is usually without the level of micromanaging that has gone on here. 

it could be that there will be a scaled back level of accountability, but with tepper... we need to see it first before we believe there's any sense of learned/acquired moderation in his management style.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...