Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe Tepper learned something...


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jmac said:

It appears he is giving Canales the reigns to hire the coaching staff he wants. Maybe the first step in getting out of the way and letting the HC decide the hires. If he continues this with Morgan also, things may be looking up. Seems like Morgan knows who the guys that where rocking the ship are and is cutting bait.

Fingers crossed 

 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I agree…now how will this place act in week 8 of an rough season next year WHICH IS EXPECTED

Depends. Are they playing better overall than they were in week 1 and are the coaches actually adapting their strategies?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KSpan said:

Depends. Are they playing better overall than they were in week 1 and are the coaches actually adapting their strategies?

If by week 8 the team is obviously better and Bryce is still struggling the Tepper middling will still be an issue. Daltons fine, very curious what they'll do about a qb3 for camp/scout team/etc considering some udfa's were outplaying Bryce last year. I'd hope Tepper would pick winning over trying to prove himself right eventually whether that's a qb change or just letting the coaches and gm do their thing. If the team starts winning he can start coming out and dancing like a moron pregame again

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will believe Tepper learned something when we start winning. Which will mean we start to see a LOT less of him in the public eye as he lets the football professionals deal with football.

As long as he is the dumbest but most confident guy in your fantasy football league, he won't be successful.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...