Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor of Burns traded to Baltimore (probably baseless rumor)


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fanrecap article

I dunno how reputable this site is, they reference Bleacher Report but don’t give a link and the wording makes it sound like BR is just spitballing possibilities rather than actually hearing a rumor. The title of the fanrecap article implies there’s actual rumor of it happening. I’m guessing it’s unfounded speculation. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Fanrecap article

I dunno how reputable this site is, they reference Bleacher Report but don’t give a link and the wording makes it sound like BR is just spitballing possibilities rather than actually hearing a rumor. The title of the fanrecap article implies there’s actual rumor of it happening. I’m guessing it’s unfounded speculation. 

https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2024/01/31/brian-burns-trade-ravens-panthers/

They worded it as a trade they'd love to see.  Don't think anything is in the works.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, csx said:

It says Bleacher Report proposal.

"Hypothetical" used multiple times.

The trade window is not open.

How could you interpret anything on that page being about Burns "traded"

 

Screenshot_20240201_074319_Chrome.jpg

I typo’d the title, meant to just say “Burns trade to Baltimore”, not as if it’s happened but rumor of it in the works. Is that bit you pasted from the Bleacher Report article it references? I read the fanrecap article and didn’t see the “we’d love to see” paragraph. 
 

edit: nvm, you pasted from the article Steelo linked, not me. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...