Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Introductory Press Conference


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Canales emphasized turnovers in the press conference. If Evero is here I would think that's a big item they work on this year.

The only way the panthers were getting turnovers last year is if the defense tried to strip the running back every time as they ran clock for half the game. 
 

if you want to force turnovers you need to put the opposing offense into the right situations; namely abandoning the run and needing to pass. 
 

unfortunately our head coach has spent less time as a coordinator than he did writing a book about his addiction to milfhunter, and he’s excited about one of the worst qbs in the modern era. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

Dan going hard right there talking about how we need players that are passionate about football and inflict pain on the opponent and how we havent had enough of those players in recent history.

I thought that was super candid.  He said we need "dawgs" on the team.  Canales nodded.   Need those type of players "again."  Need the logo to be feared "again."  

No BS like we "need to build" blah blah.  Promising.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

I thought that was super candid.  He said we need "dawgs" on the team.  Canales nodded.   Need those type of players "again."  Need the logo to be feared "again."  

No BS like we "need to build" blah blah.  Promising.  

Good that he said we "need" dawgs because he recognizes that we don't currently have those players. Goodbye Burns? We need to players with attitude and I'm glad Dan Morgan was made GM. He is a former player and he knows the attitude you need to play with to succeed in the NFL. Players will also relate to him because he played the game, they don't have to listen to a GM whose never even touched a football or put on a helmet. 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

 

unfortunately our head coach has spent less time as a coordinator than he did writing a book about his addiction to milfhunter, and he’s excited about one of the worst qbs in the modern era. 

He's not a perfect person.  Don't care.   It might not work.  What matters is there's a chance it will.  Hindsight maybe but there was no chance Rhule or Reich would be the guy. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Good that he said we "need" dawgs because he recognizes that we don't currently have those players. Goodbye Burns? We need to players with attitude and I'm glad Dan Morgan was made GM. He is a former player and he knows the attitude you need to play with to succeed in the NFL. Players will also relate to him because he played the game, they don't have to listen to a GM whose never even touched a football or put on a helmet. 

 

Not sure about Burns specifically,  but he was as clear as he could be that the roster isn't remotely close to good enough.  Not just talent, but character.  Pretty scathing really.   Good.

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

The only way the panthers were getting turnovers last year is if the defense tried to strip the running back every time as they ran clock for half the game. 
 

if you want to force turnovers you need to put the opposing offense into the right situations; namely abandoning the run and needing to pass. 
 

unfortunately our head coach has spent less time as a coordinator than he did writing a book about his addiction to milfhunter, and he’s excited about one of the worst qbs in the modern era. 

You are insufferable.

 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, that's an example of why I think he is being overrated around here.   Because in reality, we were nowhere close to a top 5 defense last year. 

32nd in takeaways

29th in points allowed

middle of the road on 3rd down %

that yardage stat isn't telling a complete story. 

We need a new culture.  And we are forcing are new HC.....to inherit a lot of the old.   I still think a clean slate is the best way to change the culture. 

I don't think any amount of "culture" is going to overcome the sheer talent deficit on this team, which is far and away the most pressing issue.  We need an influx of talent both from a player standpoint and a coaching standpoint, i.e. creative playcalling, scheming, etc., then maybe we can have a discussion on culture.

Harping on culture I think is reserved more for teams like the Eagles who have a stacked roster but are underachieving on the field.  How do you define "culture" anyways?  That seems like more of a nebulous buzzword I would expect during coachspeak or something.  Is it just like a locker room that holds each other accountable?  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Not sure about Burns specifically,  but he was as clear as he could be that the roster isn't remotely close to good enough.  Not just talent, but character.  Pretty scathing really.   Good.

He definitely ripped the attitude of this past years team.    Turnover going to be high over next 24 months and we need it.

I hope he sets the example by trading Burns.   Everybody knows that even the "star" will be gone if they don't toughen up.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

I don't think any amount of "culture" is going to overcome the sheer talent deficit on this team, which is far and away the most pressing issue.  We need an influx of talent both from a player standpoint and a coaching standpoint, i.e. creative playcalling, scheming, etc., then maybe we can have a discussion on culture.

Harping on culture I think is reserved more for teams like the Eagles who have a stacked roster but are underachieving on the field.  How do you define "culture" anyways?  That seems like more of a nebulous buzzword I would expect during coachspeak or something.  Is it just like a locker room that holds each other accountable?  

Culture isn't the solution to the team being better next year.  

But it is the solution to building long term stability.  

 

 

And, yea , I think you nailed it.   Holding each accountable.  Fighting to the whistle.   Calling out laziness at practice.   Competing everywhere.   All that is where culture impacts an organization.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

Culture isn't the solution to the team being better next year.  

But it is the solution to building long term stability.  

 

 

And, yea , I think you nailed it.   Holding each accountable.  Fighting to the whistle.   Calling out laziness at practice.   Competing everywhere.   All that is where culture impacts an organization.

…and these are things a RAS score or analytics cannot measure 

I feel RAS is part of the puzzle but tape don’t lie…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

well, that's an example of why I think he is being overrated around here.   Because in reality, we were nowhere close to a top 5 defense last year. 

32nd in takeaways

29th in points allowed

middle of the road on 3rd down %

that yardage stat isn't telling a complete story. 

We need a new culture.  And we are forcing are new HC.....to inherit a lot of the old.   I still think a clean slate is the best way to change the culture. 

So how much worse of a hire does this make canales, given what his offense did against evero?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My long and rambling post:   The guy is all heart, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he came back even better next year. He’s exactly the guy you lock up. The money won’t ever change the way he plays.  It was a big fumble, but what 1,000 yard back fumbles once in an entire season?  Pride. This team is FINALLY seeing guys who obviously take the game very seriously. Hunt, Chuba, Thielen, Brown, Horn (CB), Coker, Bryce (IMHO). Bye bye, Spider-Man. I don’t see these dudes being OK with teammates half-assing practice or in games. I can see Brown and Horn coming over to talk to somebody.  Good team? Ummm, maybe, but will still likely lose more close games than they win unless this last draft turns in to LOB part 2. That’s a stretch.  Pretty good/decent team. Yes. They finished the season as a pretty good team. I know I sound like a broken record harping back to it, but going in to ATL and putting a 40 burger on them en route to an OT win. A bad Panthers team would have had their brakes beaten off. We’ve seen it.  Rose colored glasses on and bonging a 40 of hopium: There are watershed moments that occur that change the course of franchises, both good and bad. If Fox doesn’t pull Rodney at halftime, the epic journey that was 2003 never happens. On the negative side, Cam taking that one hit from Watt was the end of any and all Panthers relevancy and we’ve been the biggest losers in all of pro sports as a result. Watershed moments. LOB draft. Vinny goes down and the goat is born.  Will the ATL game be the spark that this franchise has desperately needed? Could it be that they hit the mega million jackpot with Princley and Scourton as eat QBs for breakfast? Sure would be nice having 2 all-pro edge guys on the cheap for the next 4 years.  A lot of unknowns, but at least it actually feels  fun again. 
    • Ok LT and Petersen are a cut above everyone else to me cmc and Faulk are interchangeable on this list.  though Faulk was better career wise
    • Maybe faked was too strong of a word.  "Milked" may be the better way to call it. 
×
×
  • Create New...