Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers new offensive philosophy

jamos14

By jamos14,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, broncoitis said:

Do we cut loose our swiss army knife Shenault?  Has been available for more than 6 games any either season he's been here?

He's a FA but I would approve of bringing him back.  I thought he was very underutilized even when he was healthy.

 

 

Edited by jamos14
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
outlaw4 Veteran

outlaw4

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, broncoitis said:

Do we cut loose our swiss army knife Shenault?  Has been available for more than 6 games any either season he's been here?

He had shown he can make plays but he's a bit like a lesser Curtis Samuel. Can be good except he can't stay on the field. 

Expendable if we can find guys like him in the draft. Rookies much more likely to have upside or at least match his production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
demcj Community Regular

demcj

Posted
Posted

how is this "new" offensive philosophy any different from what wilks was doing after rhule?

it's still frustrating to think how much farther things would be right now if they had just built on what was established under wilks, even if he wasn't going to be the coach.

i'm confident bryce young wouldn't look like the hot trash he looks like now if he had that from day one. it was the perfect environment for a rookie qb. he may not have looked all world, but he would at least look serviceable.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...