Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a deep qb class should the panther take one day 3?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MechaZain said:

I don't like our odds of drafting a QB who will make an impact on day 3. Not when there are so many needs we could more easily address with that pick. 

The 1st pick in 2025 is what's TBD. Bryce is either going to make us competitive next year or put us in the spot to draft his replacement.

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

No to picking a QB. Worry about developing the young QB they already have on the roster instead of another one plus Young. There's too many holes on the roster and too few draft picks. Use the picks to improve the overall quality of the rest of the roster, especially since they're going with Young anyway.

The very reason why this draft is going to suck for me personally. I don't disagree with  one thing you stated, but it's not what I want or would do given the chance to make that decision.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

either we spend this year focusing one putting all the needed pieces around BY for him to succeed, or we have the team ready for the next guy. 

but this year is all about surrounding the QB, not switching out the QB.

It's about a pipeline.  The one thing we NEVER learn as an organization.  That pipeline only stops when you have your perennial Pro Bowl, All-Pro or Future HOF locked down for the next 10 years.  Until then, waiting for the current guy to completely flame out (or trade or bolt in FA) and THEN trying to replace him is why we are in this endless cycle of misery.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All teams should absolutely take a flyer on a late-round QB if they think the value is there. Those picks are dart throws anyway and what better score than to find a quality QB, even if just as a backup, that late in the draft.

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KSpan said:

All teams should absolutely take a flyer on a late-round QB if they think the value is there. Those picks are dart throws anyway and what better score than to find a quality QB, even if just as a backup, that late in the draft.

Seems to work for Green Bay who never gets stuck be in QB purgatory.  The Panthers will never learn.  Say what you will about Purdy, but that was a total flyer pick when the 49ers did not need a QB.  Revisionist history may say otherwise, but at that time they did not.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Seems to work for Green Bay who never gets stuck be in QB purgatory.  The Panthers will never learn.  Say what you will about Purdy, but that was a total flyer pick when the 49ers did not need a QB.  Revisionist history may say otherwise, but at that time they did not.

The only reason purdy wasnt cut and got reps was because Jimmy G was hurt.  Once they saw him in practice then they knew if push came to shove he would do.  If jimmy go was getting the second team reps purdy is probably cut.  Crazy how things work out

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I would not draft any QB this draft. Let Bryce either get it and become something good or lead us to a high draft pick so we can draft his replacement next season.

Problem being Penix and Nix would be vying for QB1 in next year's class.  Ewers would be QB3.  See the tragic irony there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...