Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting Crunch Time for the Panthers and Brian Burns


45catfan
 Share

What to do with Burns?  

147 members have voted

  1. 1. Burns should be

    • Frachised tagged
      35
    • Transitional tagged
      17
    • Re-singed to a top 5 Edge contract
      4
    • Traded for draft capital or player(s)
      85
    • Let test free agency and if signed away, at least get a high comp pick in 2025
      6


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

the block, so he can either create pressure or get a sack providing the QB doesn't adjust accordingly. 

That is the lamest justification for extending him that I have ever heard of.  So he's kig of the almost sacks. If he could only get those qbs from moving he would win 100% of the time. I also need them to stop running the ball so I can get more chances at a sack. Because I suck a stopping the run. Yeah that screams a player you should hang into.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is the lamest justification for extending him that I have ever heard of.  So he's kig of the almost sacks. If he could only get those qbs from moving he would win 100% of the time. I also need them to stop running the ball so I can get more chances at a sack. Because I suck a stopping the run. Yeah that screams a player you should hang into.

Getting pressure is pretty important as well.  Incompletions and hopefully interceptions can come from that.  I pointed to his sacks last year and you said they didn't come at game saving times so I am showing they were next to zero opportunities for those type of plays do to the offense sucking.  

I'm not a die hard, but just saying you may see him take off on another team once he gets more opportunities.  I hear fans crying about CMC and DJ all the times now, trade Burns and you might get more of the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Getting pressure is pretty important as well.  Incompletions and hopefully interceptions can come from that.  I pointed to his sacks last year and you said they didn't come at game saving times so I am showing they were next to zero opportunities for those type of plays do to the offense sucking.  

I'm not a die hard, but just saying you may see him take off on another team once he gets more opportunities.  I hear fans crying about CMC and DJ all the times now, trade Burns and you might get more of the same.

When you have to dig that hard to find a positive for keeping a player you've already lost. He benefits from whatever pressure Derek Brown can create up the middle.  Except Derek hardly ever comes off the field. Burns gets to rest his ass on the sidelines every other play. In the meantime Brown is out there making tackles because everyone else seems to be adverse to doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

When you have to dig that hard to find a positive for keeping a player you've already lost. He benefits from whatever pressure Derek Brown can create up the middle.  Except Derek hardly ever comes off the field. Burns gets to rest his ass on the sidelines every other play. In the meantime Brown is out there making tackles because everyone else seems to be adverse to doing. 

Block win percentage is pretty basic. They just use a percentage to account for opportunities.  Burns was 6th in the league....

Brown is the most important by far.  We need to extend him ASAP!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is true about the opportunities, situational stuff. It's turning our strengths against us. That is a nice trick if you can do it.The only way to get the opponents off of that horse is to score points.

We benefit most from having Burns when he is rushing the passer, his strength. That is it. And it follows that our goal needs to be to force that situation. Get him in a tee off scenario.

It all comes back to impotency of the offense. You know, all those guys and coaches not named Bryce, need to step it up.

[Man I get tired of the negatives all the time, but where are the positives? It’s like you have to make them up.]  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cannot say the defense is on the field too much because of the crappy offense and claim the defense doesn't get enough opportunities to make plays.  

You want to force them to pass so you can tee off? Stop them from running on you. 

You cannot stop the run? Then stop whining and gtfo.

 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

julian weighs in on burns today.  All in all the situation is pretty bleak and totally mismanaged.  Holy fug fat fitterer was horrible at his job

 

cliff notes: best case is to figure out a deal, the tag is going to be expensive in regards to our cap and letting him walk would suck but would be easier to sign free agents and rework other deals

 

 

Letting Burns walk is unfortunately the best option 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Newton:

Quote

Burns was seeking a long-term deal with an average salary of close to $30 million last season, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations. The two sides never got close. With Carolina expected to have about $39 million in cap space, it seems unlikely it will dedicate that much now to one player since they have so many other needs.

 

Quote

Canales, Morgan and new cap manager Brandt Tillis are evaluating all options, understanding their first draft pick is at No. 33 and there are no immediate plans to move into the first round. Having those three united could help get an extension for Burns. A source familiar with the team structure last season said the former staff didn't have that unity.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39557895/brian-burns-luvu-gross-matos-chinn-panthers-top-free-agents-franchise-tag

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

McDonald's iced coffee is low-key not bad for the price.

 

It beats paying for overpriced mid coffee from Starbucks and Dunkin.

 

This is how I feel about Burns. For the right price he can be McDonald's iced coffee. Pretty good for the price.

 

If he's expensive then he's just Starbucks. Mid player with a expensive price. That's a no no.

Damn, I thought about $5 bucks (inc. tax) was high. Shows what I know. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Damn, I thought about $5 bucks (inc. tax) was high. Shows what I know. 

Starbucks should be banned from selling coffee.

 

It was cool 5 years ago. Now I feel like most people just go there because it's the cool thing to do. Nothing cool about paying $7 for some average coffee.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Toomers said:

 1.8M for 2nd round pick. How can you replace a player making 900k but the cap difference number stays the same at 1.8M? You’re replacing 6 players that were making 5.4M with 6 that are making 6.5M. Simple math. Have no clue what they even mean with those numbers. Wouldn’t be the first time Sportrac screwed up numbers. 
 

  How are they making 86K as a cap hit for 2024? That’s not possible. 

I got you now about the 1.8 vs 900 deal. Sometimes a drafted class does increase the 51 floor, but I understand your point point that -900k + 1.8 doesnt = +1.8

I believe a big part of the issue is the signing bonus counts no matter. Thats the 86k hit, its a portion of allotted SB. Its guaranteed and spent, unlike the per game contract were you can get cut anyday during. 

Plus another deal we are missing is early drafted rookies contracts are nearly all guaranteed, unlike if you signed a 5th year guy. That 33rd drafted player will get 10 million if hes cut during TC and that counts against the cap. That maybe why its 1.8 cause the SB and contract are fully guaranteed(*nearly)

Also I noticed during the season the panthers had 1-2 spots left open on game days. Then you got PS call ups and form what I know they get more money up to 4 times a year. Again taking cap space. I think there are veteran exceptions about paying more while the cap number is listed lower, which makes understanding it harder too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2024 at 12:02 PM, CmC2k said:

https://www.sbnation.com/2023/2/21/23608375/nfl-franchise-tag-transition-exclusive-rules-salary-lamar-jackson-daniel-jones

I'm defiantly a fan of the Non-exclusive franchise tag. If Burns thinks he's worth $30 million a season, then allow him to test the market to see if another team will offer it. If he does, then we can match the offer sheet or let him go but get 2 1st from the team that signs him. 

Burns is a good player, and I would love to have him back on a fair deal but his lack of a take over a game skill set makes him not worth $30 million a year. During the 1st half against ATL in week 1 Burns flashed the ability to take over a game like other $30 million a year pass rushers do but that was the only time he's ever shown the ability to do that. 

 

If the compensation was 2 firsts we need to take it.  We have Brown to resign as well as Luvu and we need to build an entire offense basically.  
Maybe even 1 first would do it if mid round.

I don’t like the idea of letting good players walk but his asking price is too expensive for what he has done here

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...