Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns on Twitter(X)

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Been listening to a lot of the C3 podcast and Cody has changed my mind on Burns.  I don’t like trading away good players when we don’t have any but Burns wanting 30 mil per range with our current situation doesn’t compute.  
 

Tag and trade feels like a real possibility if some team wants to pay him.  I want picks and a first absolutely has to be included.  It’s time to move him.

He is legit worth 22-24 range but that’s overpaid IMO.  He is definitely the best player in free agency with his age and talent and we have to cash that in

Josh Allen from Jax is way ahead of Burns. He had 17.5 sacks, 2x as many qb pressures and is a good run defender. Chris Jones is also a FA and Hunter.

Burns isn't the top FA 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, csx said:

Josh Allen from Jax is way ahead of Burns. He had 17.5 sacks, 2x as many qb pressures and is a good run defender. Chris Jones is also a FA and Hunter.

Burns isn't the top FA 

In free agency, regarding EDGEs, Burns is second. The Athletic has him as the top FA.

https://theathletic.com/5280918/2024/02/19/free-agency-rankings-nfl-best-available/

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-free-agency-2024-chris-jones-brian-burns-kirk-cousins-headline-top-50-free-agents-this-offseason/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2024/02/14/nfl-free-agency-2024-ranking-best-players-available/72573229007/

The worst I saw was Fox (of course) which had him at 11. Still, it's relatively high.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, top dawg said:

In free agency, regarding EDGEs, Burns is second. The Athletic has him as the top FA.

https://theathletic.com/5280918/2024/02/19/free-agency-rankings-nfl-best-available/

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-free-agency-2024-chris-jones-brian-burns-kirk-cousins-headline-top-50-free-agents-this-offseason/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2024/02/14/nfl-free-agency-2024-ranking-best-players-available/72573229007/

The worst I saw was Fox (of course) which had him at 11. Still, it's relatively high.

I was responding to him saying he was the best player in Free Agency. He's likely 3rd edge

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, top dawg said:

In free agency, regarding EDGEs, Burns is second. The Athletic has him as the top FA.

https://theathletic.com/5280918/2024/02/19/free-agency-rankings-nfl-best-available/

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-free-agency-2024-chris-jones-brian-burns-kirk-cousins-headline-top-50-free-agents-this-offseason/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2024/02/14/nfl-free-agency-2024-ranking-best-players-available/72573229007/

The worst I saw was Fox (of course) which had him at 11. Still, it's relatively high.

I don't think anyone is arguing that Burns isn't good.  The issue is that he's merely good and wants to be paid like he's elite. In a hard salary cap league that's a problem. We have holes all over our roster. We can't afford to tie up a good chunk of our cap in an overpaid player who is a one trick pony.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think anyone is arguing that Burns isn't good.  The issue is that he's merely good and wants to be paid like he's elite. In a hard salary cap league that's a problem. We have holes all over our roster. We can't afford to tie up a good chunk of our cap in an overpaid player who is a one trick pony.

We wanted to give him a max crosby type deal around 23ish a year.  Burns wanted 30.  The panthers came all the way up to 27 and burns wanted 30.   fug him and the horse he rode in on.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stingray3030 Proficient

Stingray3030

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We wanted to give him a max crosby type deal around 23ish a year.  Burns wanted 30.  The panthers came all the way up to 27 and burns wanted 30.   fug him and the horse he rode in on.

Gotta agree here - sometimes you gotta let go - shoulda traded him and we missed, but now we have to get the trade done as best we can.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Gotta agree here - sometimes you gotta let go - shoulda traded him and we missed, but now we have to get the trade done as best we can.  

he is not operating in good faith, add that he took last year off I say get what you can for him.  Its clear the panthers were trying to get a deal done but he is acting like a child

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stingray3030 Proficient

Stingray3030

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

he is not operating in good faith, add that he took last year off I say get what you can for him.  Its clear the panthers were trying to get a deal done but he is acting like a child

Yep - that is why I like the non-exclusive tag - let him go try and get his $30M - if he does we get 2 first round picks.  If he doesn't we sign and trade.  But at least we don't let him walk and get nothing more than a late 3rd round pick.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
blueandblackattack Collaborator

blueandblackattack

Posted
Posted (edited)

According to Spotrac, they track his performance as earning a contract of $21/yr. Not that they ever end up that way, but I really like how Spotrac breaks it down how they come to that calculation based on production around players in their similar performance bracket.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/brian-burns-29051/market-value/

I thought he missed more time than just a few games, but his best year really was when he had another legit pass rusher on the other side. I love the guy, but he's not a game wrecker without someone else on the other side, at least thus far. But he's 25, so there's still room to grow.

 

image.thumb.png.6701b6235cd457d4d5164fcd20d23a88.png

 

I think up to $25/yr is fair, if we can restructure Moton and make room. But if it comes down to either paying out DB or Burns, I'd honestly go DB. He just has a motor that doesn't quit or slow down, and is a game wrecker without much help. But we'll see how things unfold.

Edited by blueandblackattack
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
IndyPanther Contributor

IndyPanther

Posted
Posted

I don't even know how this is a discussion. He has always been a complete liability against the run and like others have said, essentially took the entirety of last season off. We should've shipped him off years ago but take what we can get for him this offseason and move on.

The "trading talent away for picks just to use those picks to try and replace them" argument is a good one generally, and certainly would've made sense for Moore or McCaffrey. But Burns is not worth anything approaching or even close to what he thinks he is and likely isn't worth close to what someone would give up in a trade. I wouldn't give him more than $20M and even that is pretty generous. There are so many games where he completely disappears and that's with an elite DT taking a lot of OL attention. Put him on the next plane out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leaky_Faucet Community Regular

Leaky_Faucet

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, SOJA said:

Someone is lying I just don't know who is. Person is reporting Burns asked for 30 a year and was offered 5 mill 27 mill. Early this year it was reported that the Panthers offered the Crosby contract ~23.5 mill a year

That being said, the Panthers have been DRAGGED this entire year for not trading burns and then "not trying to sign him". If they offered him 5 years 27 mill a year that is a very fair deal and we can stop saying they "didn't do anything to sign him"

Yeah so back to my messages around week 1- Everything I was being told then was that they finally agreed on the $/yr amount but then the guaranteed amount was off. So what Joe is saying correlates with what I had figured. Panthers possibly went to 27m/yr then backed off off on gtd as part of the offer. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      [Joe Person] Jonathon Brooks had a successful 2nd ACL surgery - Expected to miss all of 2025 Season

      By TD alt · Posted

      He doesn't need to play in 2025. And maybe not 2026 either from what I've read. This is but one peer-reviewed selection:    "A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226931/     Regarding your first question... "The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision that affects patient outcomes significantly. Even though there is no consensus in the literature, there are some trends regarding timing of ACLR. Various authors suggest that ACLR be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis. More important than time alone, objective criteria including perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia, and ROM are important indicators of when surgery should be performed." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004131/#:~:text=The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision,in order to avoid arthrofibrosis.  
    • Stingray3030
      [The Athletic] Panthers’ offseason to-do list

      By Stingray3030 · Posted

      Not sure I would be so sure they feel worse than us - their QB was better than Bryce at in the first season, they got DJ Moore, and 2 more high caliber draft picks.  We had to give up basically our entire defense this season indirectly to make that happen and we still have no true #1 WR.  Not saying I would rather have Caleb over Bryce at this point - but I would rather have their team situation and draft picks hands down.
    • MHS831
      Panthers free agents

      By MHS831 · Posted

      A lot of people think this draft is weak at QB--I think, after the first five picks of the first round, there are a ton of developmental QBs who could develop into the role--here is the psychology behind it--Bryce becomes the mentor--you can learn as much by teaching others than by being taught.   It also makes him a true leader.  But I think there are a few QB in this draft that might not be ready now, but in 2 years, could be NFL starting QBs--Howard, Rourke, Ewers, Milroe, Dart, etc.  Talk about a cheaper backup and one that could evolve into trade capital--or if Bryce can't find consistency-his replacement.  Round 3 will have some of these qbs--maybe early day 3.
×
×
  • Create New...