Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Williams rumor


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, csx said:

Rodgers. I know he loves the attention of being a conspiracy theorist (no idea why) but that level of stupid will tarnish the rest of his life. 

 

Lol I don't think he cares.

Nothing he has said or done makes me think he cares about his reputation as long as he can get attention for being a contrarion.

He's just an idiot. I thought Face was dumb, but Rodgers just seems to think that is just something else to try and one up him on.

Both were good QBs. Both are morons who will spend the rest of their lives proving that you can always get dumber.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CRA said:

Theilen handicaps the slot position too much to be the locked in Y.   He isn’t a slot WR in today’s NFL. 

it kills all YAC potential.  He is just a sure handed TE essentially. 
 

 

fair enough then play Johnson at Y, Mingo at z (gulp) and Thielen as a TE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SOJA said:

fair enough then play Johnson at Y, Mingo at z (gulp) and Thielen as a TE

Theilen isn't a TE though.  You can't actually play him in that role because they also have to do things besides go out for routes.   That's just what he represents as a receiving threat.  A sure handed TE.  And his production per catch mimics the TEs and not WRs. 

I just think Thielen is a bad fit.  Given what we need around Bryce and what we need those players to do for him. 

If Bryce Young is my QB.....rec RB, slot WR, and TE are my big 3 positions I would focus on.  Which is what I thought going into last season.  You need playmakers there and dudes that can do something more than just catch.   Focus on small ball.  Which is why I not a fan of a bad Mike Williams marriage here.  Which is what we did all last season.  Random parts.  Bryce Young isn't chucking it downfield and playing risky.  That's not his DNA.  Mike Williams belongs w/ a risk taker. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

Theilen isn't a TE though.  You can't actually play him in that role because they also have to do things besides go out for routes.   That's just what he represents as a receiving threat.  A sure handed TE.  And his production per catch mimics the TEs and not WRs. 

I just think Thielen is a bad fit.  Given what we need around Bryce and what we need those players to do for him. 

If Bryce Young is my QB.....rec RB, slot WR, and TE are my big 3 positions I would focus on.  Which is what I thought going into last season.  You need playmakers there and dudes that can do something more than just catch.   Focus on small ball.  Which is why I not a fan of a bad Mike Williams marriage here.  Which is what we did all last season.  Random parts.  Bryce Young isn't chucking it downfield and playing risky.  That's not his DNA.  Mike Williams belongs w/ a risk taker. 

 

AT was 10th in receptions 15th in targets his yards per reception was low could argue that was due to horrible qb and oline play or could argue he just is slowing down probably some of both but not sure removing youngs only dependable trusted wr would be beneficial but could be wrong.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe I just read somewhere that the Rams don't do Top 30 Visits. I mean, it makes sense from the standpoint of trying to keep information close to the vest.
    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
×
×
  • Create New...