Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was the Cam game vs Arizona the most recent high point of the franchise

Mayor Qumiby
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Kentucky Panther said:

2017 had some fun moments. That was our last really solid team. 

That was 7 years ago, I wouldn't call that "recent".

The best time during the Tepper era was Cam's return game vs Arizona, and trading up for number one overall last year. Bryce sucks but it was a fun month lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

That was 7 years ago, I wouldn't call that "recent".

The best time during the Tepper era was Cam's return game vs Arizona, and trading up for number one overall last year. Bryce sucks but it was a fun month lol.

lol.  The high point of the Tepper era was Cam Newton playing 7 snaps in game vs AZ.....on a 5 win team.  

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumHam Veteran

RumHam

Posted
Posted
On 4/6/2024 at 9:21 PM, PappyMay said:

It was.  But the next one is April 26/27 when Dan Morgan drafts 4 quality starters. One which will end up being a probowler.

i'll revisit this at a later date.

The "playoff run" was after the Cam game where hope was restored in the franchise. You could argue that Atlanta game where DJ got the hose call. Lions game that year was a pretty high point, but then we just Panthered for two weeks after and poo the bed as usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
On 4/8/2024 at 10:18 AM, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

That was 7 years ago, I wouldn't call that "recent".

The best time during the Tepper era was Cam's return game vs Arizona, and trading up for number one overall last year. Bryce sucks but it was a fun month lol.

7 is less than 9 so it is the most rececent. With is what the question is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...