Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Day 2 WR projection. Different take


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

All this really means nothing if you really acknowledge the truth of it. If he's saying that Legette is going to flop, then whoop-de-doo. Join all the other fans with opinions. If he's saying that it's not going to go over with the fans, well not everyone will be happy anyway.

It's hardly analysis to label receivers or situations as the same without looking at specifics and details as to why things are the way they are.

Furthermore, time reveals all things. It's like I keep having to post the same things that should easily make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you watch some of their YouTube highlights, these WR are running free and wide open. Coverage is so soft in college, they are going to meet tougher competition in the NFL that will shut them down. Guys who are good route runners and can create separation can win in the NFL. Guys who are fast and need to be schemed wide open will struggle more. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty excited about a good few WRs in this class. I have to say Franklin isn't one of those guys I'm stoked about.

If their greatest contribution is speed, I'm not the greatest fan. They have to either be a good route guy and create separation or be someone who can muscle the ball away from anyone. If they don't do either of those things we'll, I'm not a huge fan.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Im pretty excited about a good few WRs in this class. I have to say Franklin isn't one of those guys I'm stoked about.

If their greatest contribution is speed, I'm not the greatest fan. They have to either be a good route guy and create separation or be someone who can muscle the ball away from anyone. If they don't do either of those things we'll, I'm not a huge fan.

How did you feel about ted ginn

speed plus the ability to catch is deadly in the nfl

tyrek hill isnt a great route runner. He doesn't have to be

in the ithet hand, im not dure you g can get it to him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

How did you feel about ted ginn

speed plus the ability to catch is deadly in the nfl

tyrek hill isnt a great route runner. He doesn't have to be

in the ithet hand, im not dure you g can get it to him

Hill is one of the best Route runners in the league.....

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

How did you feel about ted ginn

speed plus the ability to catch is deadly in the nfl

tyrek hill isnt a great route runner. He doesn't have to be

in the ithet hand, im not dure you g can get it to him

We had a different QB. Guys like ginn are good for gunslingers. That ain't exactly Young.

Get the WRs that will help Bryce rather than the type WRs you prefer.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

When you watch some of their YouTube highlights, these WR are running free and wide open. Coverage is so soft in college, they are going to meet tougher competition in the NFL that will shut them down. Guys who are good route runners and can create separation can win in the NFL. Guys who are fast and need to be schemed wide open will struggle more. 

Very true, I don't think many understand that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, rayzor said:

We had a different QB. Guys like ginn are good for gunslingers. That ain't exactly Young.

Get the WRs that will help Bryce rather than the type WRs you prefer.

I dont prefer anything  honestly …but you have to make defenses think that once in a blue moon young MIGHT be able to stretch the field

that inability of his is why i never wanted him to be drafted 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I dont prefer anything  honestly …but you have to make defenses think that once in a blue moon young MIGHT be able to stretch the field

that inability of his is why i never wanted him to be drafted 

We've got who we've got and we're stuck with it for a while.

We can't draft based on the QB we wish we had. Focus has to be on who's best to help Bryce succeed. Doesn't matter if people don't want him. He's here. Now let's just try to make it work with him here.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Zavala was really bad his first year but I think he can still flash that unfortunately. Coaching? IDK. Inconvenience seems to be common.  Moton should just have played the year out to see what's what or they should have replaced him, whixh is a tall order for a team with so much else needing done. I just thought the reworked deal was dumb. Get cap but create another issue later. Just eat it and move on. I do think they were trying to create space for someone else but that's also a huge negative for me because the 'one player away mentality' has always been a failure that I can remember. Corbett was a known health issue, a waste of roster space really. BC has had a fractured ankle and a torn bicep so he isn't a huge shocker either, unlucky or injury prone at this point? Add in Moton and that unit was always suspect. Having both high priced OGs dealing with injuries 1 year removed from their big deals just seems like the chefs kiss to that entire build. So 2 known injury issues with starters, a backup that's probably injury prone now, Mays and then nobodies. I don't think I can call that decent depth, especially considering the 2 known starter issues coming into the year.
    • Just imagine how great it will be when they eventually expand the playoff to 24 teams, or more. There will still only be 3 or 4 teams that have a real chance of winning the national championship, but the money-making opportunity will be too irresistible.
    • Trading Hubbard should be a decision made based on the "future" of the team. If they deem Rico a wiser investment, long term, Hubbard is expendable. If they deem Hubbard the wiser investment, long term, Rico is expendable. That doesn't mean they should have a price that is less than acceptable, however.
×
×
  • Create New...