Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

🚨Tony Pauline: Panthers interested in CB Mike Sainristril @33


Recommended Posts

Hey if they think he is BPA....go get him. We need CBs and will definitely have to fill that room next year with a lot of new faces. If ( big If ) Horn stays healthy and this kid is taken and lives up to it, they have also made next year a lot easier. If Horn doesn't stay healthy and this kid is taken and lives up to it, they at least know what kind of player they need to compliment him. 

As far as Nickle Back goes....I feel like we need good DBs at all levels now, a lot of the game is those short/quick passes within 5-10 yards. Someone who can play well covering close to the line and also have a feeling for where the ball is going is really valuable. Bills and Colts just paid a pretty decent amount to their NBs. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Played 22% outside, 151 snaps of 684, but played one of the highest % of MI defensive snaps. 

What's a given is that he played a lot in Michigans's 4-2-5 with diverse assignments--which people saying he's slot exclusive or nickel aren't really considering the responsibilities for his potential role in the Fangio-hybrid penny package we run...this kid would get used 90%+ of snaps easily.  

 

He better walk on water.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, top dawg said:

He better walk on water.

You’re saying that because you don’t value the position - I disagree considering our scheme and how the NfL is these days. 

If people are serious about BPA then trust the process—and these are the talents to consider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

He's been pretty consistently top 40 on PFF this offseason (currently #34).  #43 overall for Brugler.

PFF rankings don’t translate well. Greg Little case in point. This seems like a big reach if 43 is his best ranking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

You’re saying that because you don’t value the position - I disagree considering our scheme and how the NfL is these days. 

If people are serious about BPA then trust the process—and these are the talents to consider. 

Evero didn’t use Chinn at all. He played 27% of snaps. Diverse assignments and hybrid role worries me. Chinn is every bit as athletic as Sainristil in a much bigger (almost 40 pounds) package.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

You’re saying that because you don’t value the position - I disagree considering our scheme and how the NfL is these days. 

If people are serious about BPA then trust the process—and these are the talents to consider. 

Perhaps. I would still prefer Kool-Aid or T.J. than a smaller corner. Relative to our immediate needs, I would think that a true outside CB is more important than a slot corner. We have a guy or two that can play slot corner just fine. I just don't believe that at 33, he's going to be the BPA. I don't believe it at 39 either to be honest. We'll see come Saturday.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Evero didn’t use Chinn at all. He played 27% of snaps. Diverse assignments and hybrid role worries me. Chinn is every bit as athletic as Sainristil in a much bigger (almost 40 pounds) package.

Yeah it was weird with Chinn - I still don't get what the deal was.  Interestingly enough, historically, Evero used Bryce Callahan, Kyle Fuller and then found his way to McMilian at NB/his primary slot corner in the box, all undersized (2) 5'9 and (1) 5'11.

I just don't think Chinn fit what he likes in the position.  Chinn was also on the sidelines when Horn was healthy and we played Jackson outside and Hill in the slot.  So he didn't even settle into the role consistently.  Under 200 snaps total on the year.  

Edit - add: Also tried K’Waun Williams there who's also 5'9ish.   His LAR days - Darious Williams 5'9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please no. OFFENSE OFFENSE OFFENSE!!!

So sick and tired of being behind the modern league because we continue to use our high draft picks on defensive players. Build the offense, the rules are built for it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How could people be upset about this? Can anyone even NAME our current NB?? How about the CB2 opposite Horn? All I know is I sure hecking cant especially after CJ was let go.

I like what they have to say about his attitude. We need guys like this on our team. If he truly played that much on the best defense he is clearly a talented football player. And talented football players are exactly what we need right now. 

Plus if you think hes available at 33 maybe grab a WR there and try again at 39? 

Either way, we need to go BPA right now every single pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Daeavorn said:

How could people be upset about this? Can anyone even NAME our current NB?? How about the CB2 opposite Horn? All I know is I sure hecking cant especially after CJ was let go.

I like what they have to say about his attitude. We need guys like this on our team. If he truly played that much on the best defense he is clearly a talented football player. And talented football players are exactly what we need right now. 

Plus if you think hes available at 33 maybe grab a WR there and try again at 39? 

Either way, we need to go BPA right now every single pick.

Troy Hill. He's getting older, but it's not like he's an unknown quantity. Dane Jackson can also play the position.

We need a corner who can primarily play on the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Perhaps. I would still prefer Kool-Aid or T.J. than a smaller corner. Relative to our immediate needs, I would think that a true outside CB is more important than a slot corner. We have a guy or two that can play slot corner just fine. I just don't believe that at 33, he's going to be the BPA. I don't believe it at 39 either to be honest. We'll see come Saturday.

Valid - good discussion btw.

I will say, this is where I get a bit more sold on specific players over filling a void.  I do think there's validity in balancing positional priority in the draft with BPA, so I understand where you're coming from -- I'm more so just finding myself pretty compelled by this guy.    

I'm not a huge fan of Arnold and Kool-Aid, but they do check boxes and are overall really sound prospects.  If available, hell yeah, they or even DeJean would be optimal.  Do note - McKinstry isn't a ballhawk by any means and Arnold has even less CB experience than Sainistrill.  Elsewhere, TJ Tampa isn't that good in the run game, played a lot of off-man and only had 3 picks his entire career.  So you're banking on him rising to his potential.  Wiggins - he's hot/cold, has the size and some injury concerns.  It's just a big crop of different guys.  I've read mixed reviews on Lassiter and will be honest, don't know much on Rakestraw.  

You look a little further on the boards, and I think the Max Melton and Dru Philips types seem just as exciting at around the 3rd round.  

This will all be about what the board presents.  Looking at the prospects themselves, their production, consistency, accolades, word about their character/IQ, and how it seemed they fit in on their team (i.e. Mike S. being defensive captain & his team's voted MVP), that can tell a lot about success at the next level when all factored in together.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

yep.  Outside corner?  sure.  but not a nickle that high

I think the top paid NB is at 9 million per, Id even take a safety over a NB. Sure its the base and all, but a safety is on for 100% of the plays, NB maybe 65%. If you fail outside, they try you at NB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...