Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How accurate is Madden for coaches?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

At risk of collecting piles of poo, a stupid question--how well does Madden's AI account for actual playbook and coaching?

I ask because I've recently gotten around to playing '24 more (refuse to pay for it since it eventually comes with GamePass), and with Canales' playbook, the Bucs run a LOT of play action. Is that realistic? Is that what we can expect here as well? Given the draft investment in the RB position and Bryce's..."dimensions"...maybe so?

Edited by BrisbanePanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

At risk of collecting piles of poo, a stupid question--how well does Madden's AI account for actual playbook and coaching?

I ask because I've recently gotten around to playing '24 more (refuse to pay for it since it eventually comes with GamePass), and with Canales' playbook, the Bucs run a LOT of play action. Is that realistic? Is that what we can expect here as well? Given the draft investment in the RB position and Bryce's..."dimensions"...maybe so?

I swear the playbook from Madden 2010 is THE EXACT (or very very VERY close to) the same playbook for 23.

I didn't play any of the Maddens inbetween for the most part, and my son has been asking me to play with him a lot. 22 and 23 had almost identical playbooks to 10.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's very accurate at all overall IMO. I just think back to the Cam era. Madden had to incorporate read option in order to even begin to replicate the Panthers' offense but there were only a handful of read option plays in the playbook. Realistically, I bet at a third of our passing plays in those days involved some aspect of read option and a third might be conservative.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

There is no way the individual offenses would be even offered to Madden. 

Well, obviously. I think they just watch the games and then try to build a playbook that vaguely resembles the offense that coach runs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, obviously. I think they just watch the games and then try to build a playbook that vaguely resembles the offense that coach runs.

Which is doable. Well. Use to be.  Seems like it's more challenging to do the same things in 2024 than what I did 20 years ago. 

Luckily the quality of graphics in the game haven't changed. 🤣🤣

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, obviously. I think they just watch the games and then try to build a playbook that vaguely resembles the offense that coach runs.

This is exactly along the lines that I was wondering. If some YouTuber can diagram plays or follow an All 22 to review games, surely EA can afford to have people do something like this, and it wouldn't surprise me if they had computers do this automatically in order to build the AI. I mean we're talking about calculating football plays not the orbits of Jupiter's moons lol.

Edited by BrisbanePanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrisbanePanther said:

I this is exactly along the lines that I was wondering. If some YouTuber can diagram plays or follow an All 22 to review game, surely EA can afford to have people do something like this, and it wouldn't surprise me if they had computers do this automatically in order to build the AI. I mean we're talking about calculating football plays not the orbit of Jupiter's moons.

You also have to consider the average user of their product vs. the time and effort involved in building a playbook. How many Madden players are legitimately looking for the absolute best, most accurate football simulation they can get? Most want a somewhat accurate representation that's entertaining. They're building a video game for entertainment, not trying to build a perfect football simulator. Personally, I'd greatly prefer the latter but I also understand that I'm a tiny sliver of a minority that isn't financially worth catering to. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's more to coaching than play calling, even down on the field. Madden isn't going to simulate how your WR1 had a big fight with his wife the night before the game and is stiff from sleeping on the couch. It's not going to simulate that the fight was because the QB's wife was flirting with the WR and now, because she went full on ballistic that the QB now knows about it.

It's not going to simulate that questionable bucket of wings your o-line shared three hours before the game is now causing cramps and gas. It's also not going to simulate the real wear and tear of the season and how about December even the moderately good teams are about halfway spending their brain power on picking their January vacation destinations.

But for a video game, it's pretty good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but Bryce Young is what amplifies that concern for me for a super green HC and OC.   it’s all and marriages by Tepper IMO.  Canales and the new OC probably would have a better time getting their O running with a vet QB that is a natural fit.   again, I’m not arguing Canales and Morgan should be catering to Bryce at this point.  Just pointing out how pointless drafting Bryce looks at this stage.  And I don’t disagree you either can play or can’t and the O is irrelevant at this level.   I mean fit matters at this level.  Everyone is too talented.  Fit makes or breaks careers. 
    • Excellent post, Jackie Lee.  I watched every second.
    • Yes you have said all of that as well. I was just saying having concerns about a one year OC transitioning to HC and trying to call plays like you have stated before as well implies he could be in over his head this first year. I’m not calling you out or anything. It’s a concern and I’m sure there will be some growing pains along the way. As for the Bryce thing, he is either a NFL QB or he isn’t. If he doesn’t look any better this year, then I think we simply move on and let Canales pick his guy. I think Beck has a big arm if that’s his type. Trying to build a very unique roster just to see if he can find success isn’t a good idea IMO. If he looks much better this year then sure you can cater a little more to his skillset. 
×
×
  • Create New...