Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many games are you willing to give Young?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
On 7/27/2024 at 2:07 PM, Gapanthersfan said:

It’s not how many, it’s how it looks. 

if we’re losing, but I see some fire, passion, urgency, growth and he’s at least making NFL throws,  I’ll give him at least 8 games. 

If he looks like he doesn’t want to be there, No fire, no drive and his teammates still look like they don’t respect him? 3 games, max. It’ll be a ‘Bryce just needs some more time to develop’ type move. 

We need to at least get a fan base back again, draft be dammed. For us pick 4 vs 12 may not really matter all that much. I’ll sacrifice 8 draft spots to see watchable football again. Draft capital hasn’t done us much good up to this point anyway. We need winning. If a turd is a turd, flush it down. No one will come if the 2023 Bryce is under center. As hard as it is to come to grips with, we can at least win with Andy. Maybe even go .500. 2023 Bryce gives us no hope. 

I’m glad we never gave him that third game. 

How bad is it when we underestimate just how damn bad Bryce could play. We all expected to see at least something. 

I think we’ll pick at 8. 

Edited by Gapanthersfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Top 5 easy

I could see that as well, especially if we can’t stay healthy at LB. But like I said, a top 5 I’m not sure really benefits us. I’d really rather go stud DE in the first round. Let him develop with Andy at QB where there is a chance of the other team playing from behind. 

Andy plays a key roll in developing talent on D with his ability to keep the offense rolling. It’s tough to learn anything when the other team is up 3 scores and they spend the entire second half running it down your throat. 

Edited by Gapanthersfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2024 at 10:04 PM, Ricky Spanish said:

I say I'm willing to give him the entire year, but if week 6 rolls around and he still looks absolutely cheeks I'll be ready to move on then and there.

Even Bryce's biggest detractors probably didn't see it going as poorly as it did. I am going to give myself credit for this one, even though he only lasted two games. He was worse than cheeks, so I was ready to move on sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Even Bryce's biggest detractors probably didn't see it going as poorly as it did. I am going to give myself credit for this one, even though he only lasted two games. He was worse than cheeks, so I was ready to move on sooner rather than later.

My mind was 95% certain he was not an NFL guy but I didn't have any idea that would be THAT horrible a second year. 

I was resigned to him being able to string us along and was also dreaming of the high pick after missing out this year. I said 17 games at the top of this, but also I figured I already knew and by 7 or 8 games it would be clear to everyone. Wanted to give him every benefit of the doubt so people would be able to see - time for the OL to get a groove and Brooks to be back and Legette to be worked in some. 

He is SO bad, poison on the field. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, strato said:

My mind was 95% certain he was not an NFL guy but I didn't have any idea that would be THAT horrible a second year. 

I was resigned to him being able to string us along and was also dreaming of the high pick after missing out this year. I said 17 games at the top of this, but also I figured I already knew and by 7 or 8 games it would be clear to everyone. Wanted to give him every benefit of the doubt so people would be able to see - time for the OL to get a groove and Brooks to be back and Legette to be worked in some. 

He is SO bad, poison on the field. 

I figured about the same number of games and thought Canales would let him linger for Tepper show purposes.  Clad he threw in the towel early on the QB whisperer thing. Hard to fix broken. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I figured about the same number of games and thought Canales would let him linger for Tepper show purposes.  Clad he threw in the towel early on the QB whisperer thing. Hard to fix broken. 

Yes sir.

Broken, can I call it a factory second or something? A mini Cooper trying to do offroad. He is just a bad design with that tippy toe and the horrible footwork and the jumping and the whole. Man it's been ugg lee all the way. 

 

 

Anyway, peace. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...