Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Rapoport on Bryce: "Everyone had Bryce Young #1"

Icege

By Icege,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NorthTryon Mentor

NorthTryon

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, strato said:

I feel like yes this place was heavy for the processor. You could not express doubt without catching a ton of scoffing and derision, and being told all about it. 

and yeah, I was totally against that trade. 1000%

You stay at your spot and be creative and be better than having to mortgage your future because you can’t get one any other way. 

 

Yeah, I know it wouldn't have been flashy, but take Jalen Carter continuing to establish a great defense and wait until this year or next where there were a host of good QBs.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Didn't think they should have traded up for a QB. Too many quesion marks at Oline and receiver. Trading DJ made it even worse.

After trading up, Richardson was the only one that made sense to me. Figured he could just make enough plays with his legs to win games. Say what you want, but the Huddle would have been dogging Stroud if he would have come here too. Just for different reasons. 

Including DJ in the trade package for a QB was idiotic. Yeah, let's mortgage the future on a QB and trade our only proven NFL WR in the process. Brilliant.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thennek Experienced

thennek

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Including DJ in the trade package for a QB was idiotic. Yeah, let's mortgage the future on a QB and trade our only proven NFL WR in the process. Brilliant.

Especially when they could have traded Burns to the Bears instead.  And kept DJ....how many WR's have they brought in since they traded DJ and they still have not replaced him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

Yeah, I know it wouldn't have been flashy, but take Jalen Carter continuing to establish a great defense and wait until this year or next where there were a host of good QBs.

David Tepper was nuclear hot after a QB for years. Fitttererererer was forced to make that trade.

I sit here and can not believe the type of problems a DL with Dbrown and the the baby RINO would deal OLs. Plus they'd still have DJ Moore and his once cheap contract along with the draft picks. But screw that, make rather have the least talented team along with a lesser PJ walker leading them.....At least PJ would have tried to get better in the off-season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

My initial reaction to when we traded for the #1 pick was it's gotta be Stroud..............because in no way would we trade all of those draft picks to take a 5'10 QB. Then Josh McCown came out with that video of him comparing Stroud to Joe Burrow and I was all in. Then I rewatched him absolutely shred through Georgia's historic defense and I was all giddy. Then a month later, Bryce hype started catching steam. I then had to convince myself that I would be OK with either, but preferred CJ Stroud. I feel like the majority of the huddle was this way. In my memory, it was about 70/30 CJ vs Bryce initially, then it started trending the other way when the Tepper news came out that he really liked Bryce.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

I might be in the minority here, but I kind of understand the trade.  The demand for QB1/pick 1 in that particular draft wasn't a crazy as others would have been (if they were even for sale).  You have to have a QB to compete consistently in this league.  DJ included in the trade was an issue, especially after trading Burns for a 2nd a year later.  Include Burns instead of DJ and signing a serviceable OLB/Edge in FA would have made more sense.  OL regression, no weapons, predictable play calling, Reich checking in and out of play calling duties etc all created a perfect storm last year.  Hindsight always helps.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I might be in the minority here, but I kind of understand the trade.  The demand for QB1/pick 1 in that particular draft wasn't a crazy as others would have been (if they were even for sale).  You have to have a QB to compete consistently in this league.  DJ included in the trade was an issue, especially after trading Burns for a 2nd a year later.  Include Burns instead of DJ and signing a serviceable OLB/Edge in FA would have made more sense.  OL regression, no weapons, predictable play calling, Reich checking in and out of play calling duties etc all created a perfect storm last year.  Hindsight always helps.

It's not that trade I disliked. I also liked the trade even WITH including DJ. We made the right decision, we just made the wrong pick.

And yeah, it's crazy how this front office loved Burns so much that it passed on TWO 1st rounders from the Rams and also didn't want to include him in the trade with the Bears...........................only to not want to pay him right after lmao This franchise man, ran by a bunch of idiots, lead by the true dumbass mastermind himself David Tepper

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I might be in the minority here, but I kind of understand the trade.  The demand for QB1/pick 1 in that particular draft wasn't a crazy as others would have been (if they were even for sale).  You have to have a QB to compete consistently in this league.  DJ included in the trade was an issue, especially after trading Burns for a 2nd a year later.  Include Burns instead of DJ and signing a serviceable OLB/Edge in FA would have made more sense.  OL regression, no weapons, predictable play calling, Reich checking in and out of play calling duties etc all created a perfect storm last year.  Hindsight always helps.

GT7psmEXUAAfb5e.thumb.jpeg.16077f5bea4c757892aa0f011c24fc31.jpeg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I might be in the minority here, but I kind of understand the trade.  The demand for QB1/pick 1 in that particular draft wasn't a crazy as others would have been (if they were even for sale).  You have to have a QB to compete consistently in this league.  DJ included in the trade was an issue, especially after trading Burns for a 2nd a year later.  Include Burns instead of DJ and signing a serviceable OLB/Edge in FA would have made more sense.  OL regression, no weapons, predictable play calling, Reich checking in and out of play calling duties etc all created a perfect storm last year.  Hindsight always helps.

the trade sucked, I wanted to just wait and see what happened once the draft started and someone always drops, then we traded and it had to be for stroud, damn I was wrong

 

would you rather have kept the 9 pick and got levis or are you taking the trade with young as we go into the 2024 season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

the trade sucked, I wanted to just wait and see what happened once the draft started and someone always drops, then we traded and it had to be for stroud, damn I was wrong

 

would you rather have kept the 9 pick and got levis or are you taking the trade with young as we go into the 2024 season?

Ok what if we drafted Stroud at 1 and threw in Burns instead of DJ. Does the trade still suck? The results sucked, but the value of the trade wasn’t that bad IMO. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

This is only news on here.  He was QB1 on most boards (some had Young/Stroud as QB1/QB2) and some people on here want to try to change history to make it appear Tepper forced some reach in us taking him.  It doesn't mean he was the right pick or will be the best QB in this class, but it is accurate.  Hell the Texans nearly moved up from 2 to get him.  

The amount of folks on here that choose to believe a hug from Nicole Tepper was the deciding factor is WILD.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ok what if we drafted Stroud at 1 and threw in Burns instead of DJ. Does the trade still suck? The results sucked, but the value of the trade wasn’t that bad IMO. 

lol thats a different trade and selection and thats basically fantasy land as we sit here on aug 6th, we did what we did for young and its biting us in the ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...