Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Joe Person Production: Joe Person’s final 53 roster projection extravaganza


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, MrBubba said:

I think 6 wide receivers, more guess than anything.  

With the TE's actually in the passing game I'd be ok with 5 if you add C Raym to this OL list instead of whatever extra WR he left off. Or do 6 Wr's and replace Mays with Raym on the O-line list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan Brooks, Dane Jackson, D.J. Wonnum, Sam Franklin, and Amare Barno will eventually take five of those spots.

Could see Marshall/Moore making it as the sixth WR and Raym making it as the backup center.

Wouldn’t be surprised to see guys like T.J. Smith, Claudin Cherelus, and Jammie Robinson moved out if there are better options on the waiver wire.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2 cents-

  • WR: I could see us cutting all but (4) Diontae, Thielen, Legette, & Mingo.  I don't think ISM makes it unless they really think his ST are that much a benefit compared to many other likely dudes on the wire.  Coker could sneak in, but I think we target the waiver wire.
  • Agree w/Persn that we keep 4
  • Zavala gets cut.  Raym or Anderson make it instead
  • We keep 5 safeties, Alex Cook makes it.  Where the space is made - Cherelus or Davis get cut in the front-7.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

My 2 cents-

  • WR: I could see us cutting all but (4) Diontae, Thielen, Legette, & Mingo.  I don't think ISM makes it unless they really think his ST are that much a benefit compared to many other likely dudes on the wire.  Coker could sneak in, but I think we target the waiver wire.
  • Agree w/Persn that we keep 4
  • Zavala gets cut.  Raym or Anderson make it instead
  • We keep 5 safeties, Alex Cook makes it.  Where the space is made - Cherelus or Davis get cut in the front-7.

 

 

 

 

We better not be cutting zavala

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We better not be cutting zavala

I personally think he's one of the worst OGs we've ever had aside Nate Chandler to play substantial regular season snaps.  We have a good swing lineman in Brady at LT, LG..not to mention, Yosh can and has played LT, RT, and LG effectively in the NFL.  

Extremely poor performance, one alright preseason game stretch, long term hammy injuries, freak injury last season, again terrible play, with a staff that didn't draft him.  I don't see how he's valuable compared to some of the UDFAs/late signings.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...