Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Sure, if they had comparable talent they wouldn’t have lost any games. They had a cupcake schedule. Putting Arizona State in the playoff over teams like Alabama or Miami is a joke. 

maybe they could of given Miami Tenn’s spot.  Tenn has been the most clowned team in the CFP so far.  THAT was an at large spot the committee could have done what they wanted with.  

Don’t see the point of complaining about conference champs outside of seeding.  The committee is not choosing them or giving them a spot. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

If ASU had comparable on the line talent to Tex…I might like them in this game.  If Boise State had comparable talent I the lines to Penn St I think they would have won.   Deion Sanders was right about one thing. It’s the lines.  That’s the difference. 

QBs in a vacuum? Lot of the favorites got overrated dudes.  

It's always been the biggest difference between the elites and all the rest in the college game. The blue chip programs are just dominant in the trenches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I would like to have ghat kid Scaterbo or however you spell. He doesn't give and it takes 5 guys to bring him down.

He’d be a good short yardage back for sure. Mike Alstott style. He’s “vomiting profusely” on the sideline right now though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I would like to have ghat kid Scaterbo or however you spell. He doesn't give and it takes 5 guys to bring him down.

Kinda reminded me of Tolbert. A quick read says fumbles are a concern as is the workload he's been getting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • when we drafted Bryce Young that team might have been more talented than the team we currently have ?  that was the whole reasoning behind morgagting  our immediate future to trade up to #1 overall for BY. our front offices & owners felt like hey guess what the time is now to srike while the iron is hot go hire an All Star coaching staff we were only a Qb away from taking that next step ..just saying   
    • I just dont get the worry over losing a practice squad player that just went undrafted. Everyone just made their selections. The chances of a team wanting to sign him to an active roster after not selecting him is very low.  If that interested they would have taken him late to evaluate in person. As far as I can tell two qbs were signed off another teams practice squad last season and they were both going in to their 5th season.
    • I enjoyed reading this thread and the usual banter that follows. The only silver lining I can identify right now is we do actually have a couple of young QB's behind him and we do have a nice roster on both sides of the ball built around the most important position. So if the team overall shows some promise but we still falter largely due to a lack of consistent passing output (again) hopefully the decision makers can be free to make the best decision for the team going forward after the conclusion of this upcoming season.
×
×
  • Create New...