Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers bring Jordan Matthews back to 53-man roster


Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Daeavorn said:

So why cut him to begin with?

I was thinking the same thing.  Only thing I could come up with is the FO was doing some shuffling with who was waiver eligible, and if Matthews wasn't, we kept a player from going to waivers while telling him he was going to be a cut and sign.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

Awesome!  Can anyone explain the gymnastics of the process?

I don't know all the nuances so this is me kind of guessing, but I believe if you are a veteran you are not subject to waivers, you can sign wherever you want. My guess is we had an agreement with him, we will cut him to do roster magic or whatever is needed to do all of our claims with the understanding he would not sign with another team and we would bring him back today to the 53. You scratch our back, we scratch yours kind of thing. I imagine this allowed us to do something like keep a player we didn't want to cut and risk losing on the roster long enough or something like that

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...