Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to Silence the Panthers Bot Again?


Luuuuuuuuuuke59
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some of the stuff the bot posts, has already been posted. Then here comes the bot to tell us the news. 

I'm saying it is pretty useless, number one, and number two, we know the Panthers have a site where all this is posted if we think we need it.

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask the Old Guy:

Richie from Richfield:  Dear Old guy, Why are you so smart and good looking?  Do you think the Panthers will punt much this year?

Old Guy:  Dear Richie, a real person I do not know, by the way.  Thanks.  I have information that may disappoint you, but the Panthers will punt this year, several times a game. 

 

I can do without.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Ask the Old Guy:

Richie from Richfield:  Dear Old guy, Why are you so smart and good looking?  Do you think the Panthers will punt much this year?

Old Guy:  Dear Richie, a real person I do not know, by the way.  Thanks.  I have information that may disappoint you, but the Panthers will punt this year, several times a game. 

 

I can do without.

That is one thing I can do without. Not a fan of that "old guy".

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, KSpan said:

 

Laetitia.

Yeah it just hit me for some reason when I saw you had quoted me. Great little passive troll job. Not sure everyone knew it was a bot at first. Creepers always came out when they thought an actual girl was posting in here.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Can anyone honestly say they don't visit the official Panthers site where these articles originate from?  If not, that's weird that you are in a Panthers forum--for Panthers fans, but don't visit their website.

I might go the Panther website twice a year 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...