Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MNF-Jets at 49ers

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted

Storyline-wise, A+ choice for first MNF game of the year

This will be low-scoring with 2 great defenses on the field and 1 of the QBs coming off a season-ending injury.  Jets pass D has been elite with Sauce Gardner, but they lost their best pass rusher from 2023 and Reddick isn't playing.  And you just really wonder how good the Jets offense will be.  Can we be so sure that Rodgers at 40 years old can be effective?  The drop-off can happen in a blink of the eye, and that is without factoring in his injury.

I'll go 49ers here, we know what we are getting with them every year when healthy, but it will be tight.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, Mage said:

Storyline-wise, A+ choice for first MNF game of the year

This will be low-scoring with 2 great defenses on the field and 1 of the QBs coming off a season-ending injury.  Jets pass D has been elite with Sauce Gardner, but they lost their best pass rusher from 2023 and Reddick isn't playing.  And you just really wonder how good the Jets offense will be.  Can we be so sure that Rodgers at 40 years old can be effective?  The drop-off can happen in a blink of the eye, and that is without factoring in his injury.

I'll go 49ers here, we know what we are getting with them every year when healthy, but it will be tight.

Has potential to be the best game of the week entertainment wise. I couldn't bother to pay attention to the late games yesterday but this one has enough storylines to be worthwhile. I live in NY but I still don't think I could bring myself to bandwagon onto the Jets or for Rodgers lol. The Giants Superbowls were fun though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Rodgers is washed and it will be on display for the country to see tonight.

I don't know. I could see that going either way.   

Rodgers has a great RB.  A great #1 WR.  A solid #2 WR.  Paired with what should be a strong D.   Even a washed Rodgers should look decent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted

Rodgers hasn't been to a SB in over a decade. It's amazing he's still a big deal.

 

Feels kind of overrated given his arm talent. Guy should definitely have more than 1 SB on his resume.

 

I just don't see how he can beat Mahomes/Lamar/Allen in the AFC. He couldn't even win the NFC with lesser talented QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...