Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Andy Dalton/Dave Canales is legit


FutureDynasty
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm wondering if "reclamation" project QBs might be the perfect archetype for this Canales offense. Having someone out there with nothing to lose really seems to fit the gun-slinging Farvesque play we've been seeing the past two weeks. Whatever it is, it is fun to watch and I'm enjoying watching for the first time in the Tepper era.

 

Let Bryce sit the rest of the season. Please.

 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Canales is legit and so is Dalton, but let's be honest the real miss is Darnold/Wilks.

 

I'm gonna laugh my ass off if Darnold wins league MVP. He's scorching the NFL right now.

Kevin O’Connell and JJ are a big reason for his success

Darnold is the type that would have success in a Canales offense as well

Darnold has had some very lucky moments this year. When the play breakdown he still makes some boneheaded decisions. Both Darnold and Fields have been able to play with the lead most of the year. We’ll see what Sam looks like when he starts pressing and the Vikes are trailing 

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Kevin O’Connell and JJ are a big reason for his success

Darnold is the type that would have success in a Canales offense as well

Darnold has had some very lucky moments this year. When the play breakdown he still makes some boneheaded decisions. Both Darnold and Fields have been able to play with the lead most of the year. We’ll see what Sam looks like when he starts pressing and the Vikes are trailing 

 

And there’s goes Fields making a mess on 3rd and 10 play pressing 

I suspect same thing will happen with Sam when they starting losing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, FutureDynasty said:

I'm wondering if "reclamation" project QBs might be the perfect archetype for this Canales offense. Having someone out there with nothing to lose really seems to fit the gun-slinging Farvesque play we've been seeing the past two weeks. Whatever it is, it is fun to watch and I'm enjoying watching for the first time in the Tepper era.

 

Let Bryce sit the rest of the season. Please.

 

I was thinking the same.
If you can field a winning team without needing to pay elite QB money bc you can groom them up, that would be amazing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MechaZain said:

2 minute drill got exposed though. Need to work on that.

And last week it kicked ass. Go figure. Sure, it all needs work and probably the first game trying to replace the glue that was Thielen, that may be a factor.

You got stuff out of place and a 2nd year plus a rookie being moved up in the depth chart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...