Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chuba Hubbard......


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Yup.  If the season keeps going down the toilet, they may just shelve Brooks for the rest of the season.  No need to risk re-injuring himself in a lost season.  Sanders is gone after this season, so in a sense he's is replacing Sanders.  If the O-line can avoid further serious injury and BC can anchor the center, I think any above average back can get similar production as Hubbard behind that line next season.  Chuba can re-sign here for a decent price or test the market.  I just hope Morgan isn't like Hurney in trying to keep guys in the fold.  If Hurney liked a player, he would overpay them just to keep that guy here.

Need to know what Brooks is and isn’t though to manage the roster for next year.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mage said:

I mean, Hubbard ran the ball 18 times.  Sanders had 3 carries.  It isn't like we didn't try to run the ball.  

There is just only so much you can run when your defense lets the other team do whatever they want.  Running the ball more isn't going to make the other teams offense any less effective.  Not against this defense.

Yeah but they ran the ball 38 times for 198 yds. That is what dedication to running the ball looks like. It's also what success running the ball looks like.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Waldo said:

20 to 25. Just run the damn ball. It's obviously a team that is built for the run to setup the pass but the HC still thinks it's the other way around.

Don't you love it when Chuba is ripping off runs at like 8 ypc then we get cute and throw 1 yard outs that get tackled for loss.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah but they ran the ball 38 times for 198 yds. That is what dedication to running the ball looks like. It's also what success running the ball looks like.

Yeah because they had the lead.  Teams who do not have the lead do not run 38 times in a game.  They just don't.  

We ran the ball as much as any HC would without having the lead.

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mage said:

Yeah because they had the lead.  Teams who do not have the lead do not run 38 times in a game.  They just don't.  

We ran the ball as much as any HC would without having the lead.

They ran 15 times in the first half(22-17 ATL lead). 

They ran 8 times in the third quarter(28-20 ATL lead).

They ran the ball 15 times in the 4th quarter(3 were Kirk kneel downs).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Things like this happen everyday. We live in a social media driven society where loyalty is a foreign concept.
    • If you draft a guy who is healthy and has no concerns about that whatsoever and he goes out and tears his ACL in his first few games in the regular season on a physical play that's a freak accident. But when you trade up to draft an RB who is already rehabbing from a recent ACL tear and he spends the next several months continuing his rehab only to tear the same ACL again after less than a handful of regular season carries in a non contact circumstance that is no freak accident. That is a textbook example of why you do not do what we did. Particularly for what is now a plug and play position. And when you have the highest paid OL in the league over the next two years. None of that makes any logical sense. Legitimately it is and was some Scott Fitterer type foolishness. Now as for XL. The guy has not been committed to his craft. I think anyone with eyes on the situation can and would recognize that. However the warning signs were there. One season of legit production raw prospect that we knew would take time to develop etc. But Morgan and Bryce Young's own father were very high on him. I think in some capacity the reality of our limitation at QB is entering into the equation. Even TMac got a lot of flak over the course of his rookie season for not being able to haul in all of Bryce's passes. At the end of the day our fourth year QB also needs to do his part to maximize the talent we have available. As far as this year. Again. WR round 1 boils down to where are we going to get the touches for the rookie? That would require eating into not only our 8th overall picks touches but also our #2 WR whom oh yeah by the way was UNDRAFTED. I am happy to discuss WR prospects here. I was thrilled we invested what we did last year in TMac because it needed to be done and it made sense from all angles. But nowhere is it written in stone that you cannot draft a good or great WR outside of the first round. Except in the Panthers building apparently. That is not a good reflection on our scouts and front office let me tell ya. Because there's no way on this earth we are going to get back to relevancy and legitimate contender status if we can't pick some gems in the later rounds. Simple and plain.
×
×
  • Create New...