Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye: Panthers might start Bryce Young final 7 games


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Wait the locker room is good right now. We still losing games.

 

What's the difference?

Winning or losing isn’t the only thing that impacts the locker room. Being competitive in losses matters, skill positions being given a chance to contribute matters. They won’t have a chance if Young is in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

horrible idea

Because our emphasis should be about developing young players and you have to pick a one or the other…

XL, Saunders, Brooks, Mingo, Coker

OR

Bryce

if you give Bryce the the starts, you then limit the development of ALL those other players.  We know the answer on Bryce. 

Canales can go if that is his logic.  And if he playing that logic there really was no point ever going to Dalton.  

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Winning or losing isn’t the only thing that impacts the locker room. Being competitive in losses matters, skill positions being given a chance to contribute matters. They won’t have a chance if Young is in there.

I played football growing up I was always taught losers are losers. There is no such thing as a good loss. You play to win the game!

 

Tepper has poisoned the fanbase into thinking that because we are competitive yet still losing games it's all fine. Nope not in my world.

 

But hey I'm not judging you. If that's how you feel so be it.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF the plan is to play Bryce again, I say play him last 2 games of the season. Not 7 games. We benched him after 2 games. 7 games gives too much opportunity for him to be benched again, which if it wasn't already over after one benching...

2 games at the end of the season and you get to see what you have with him one last time (even though almost the entire fanbase is in agreeance that he isn't it). In this scenario you get 13 games with Andy in to develop/see what you have in supporting cast players.

Not saying we should throw him out there again, not saying we shouldn't. But if we do, I say last 2 games.

Edited by CarolinaLivin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That's true, but we also have to find out if Bryce is our guy or not. We don't have time to go through this again next season. I rather we get it out the way this year.

 

Johnson is a FA regardless of Bryce or not. We know he has talent with a decent QB. Our Oline is locked up. Johnson on a discount sounds good to me.

Spoiler alert - he's not.  I think Canales is already pretty sure of that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

Dalton’s immobility is a serious problem and he is regressing. He didn’t get sacked once last game had little to show for it. Dalton is a better pure thrower but there will never be explosive plays. Time for nothing to lose midget ball

Our offense has been much more explosive with Dalton in there?  In literally every facet.   Every single player on the offense has improved statistically with Dalton at qb.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Johnstonny said:

Happy ur not in Dippers circle...NFL is a tough sport...not for the faint of heart...sorry if you are offended.

It's Disrespectful and Unnecessary! Forgive my empathy for people. I believe in treating people the way they treat me. To disrespect someone, whom you do not know, because they're paid more than you make, to play a game, at a level you can't play at, doesn't give you the right to be disrespectful from a keyboard. At the very least, you can display your feelings for that person's play without calling him out of his name. When someone says something like that, they're just looking followers, others to come in and mimic their post...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I played football growing up I was always taught losers are losers. There is no such thing as a good loss. You play to win the game!

 

Tepper has poisoned the fanbase into thinking that because we are competitive yet still losing games it's all fine. Nope not in my world.

 

But hey I'm not judging you. If that's how you feel so be it.

I’m talking about the locker room, you can tell when Bryce was in there the team was frustrated with not being given a chance to contribute or compete. With Andy there, the offensive skill players are being given opportunities. Even if they hate that they’re losing, at least they’re able to contribute and feel useful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnwell's trade column today proposed the following Young trade to the Dolphins:

Quote

 

The Panthers don't have much leverage in a potential Young trade, so a conditional pick in 2026 would make sense. Here, the Panthers would get a fourth-round pick with the potential for that pick to rise based on Young's performance. That pick would upgrade to a third-rounder if he throws for 1,500 yards in 2025 or a second-rounder if he makes it to 3,000 yards.

Uh, yeah I'd take that deal right now.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I’m talking about the locker room, you can tell when Bryce was in there the team was frustrated with not being given a chance to contribute or compete. With Andy there, the offensive skill players are being given opportunities. Even if they hate that they’re losing, at least they’re able to contribute and feel useful. 

Are you suggesting players only care about their stats?

 

What good is stats when you still losing games?

 

Dalton is not the answer either. Sure he makes games more watchable, but we have to figure out this Bryce situation sooner than later.

 

Last thing we need is this kid trying to prove himself again next season. Play him now and if he fails you move on. I don't want to deal with this crap again next season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...